Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T16:53:40.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Suggestions as to the Permanent Court of Arbitration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Jackson H. Ralston*
Affiliation:
Washington, D. C.

Extract

Through the Hague convention of 1899, for the first time by a general treaty, nations in effect agreed that under certain circumstances, at least, they were morally bound, as were ordinary corporations or mere private individuals, to submit the merits of their disputes to impartial examination. The old doctrine that the king, as the representative of Deity, could do no wrong and the newer fiction that national governments were sovereign—beyond the ordinary gauges of right and wrong—and were their own courts of last resort upon the rightfulness of their actions toward other governments, subject only to the arbitrament of war, were measurably impaired, the signatory nations admitting fallibility and agreeing that, composed as they were of an aggregate of individuals, like their component parts they might err, and that the question as to whether they had erred or not could fairly be determined by other human beings, perhaps no wiser, but certainly more impartial than themselves.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)