No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Service of Process on Foreign Official via U.S. Security Personnel
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2003
References
1 28 U.S.C. §1350 (2000).
2 28 U.S.C. §1350 note (2000).
3 Zhou v. Li Peng, 2002 WL 1835608, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2002) (the order is referred to as a “Part I Order”). The court based the order on a similar order that was issued in Kadic v. Karadzic, 70F.3d232, 246 (2d Cir. 1995). In that case, the summons and complaint were provided to U.S. government personnel, who then delivered them to the defendant as contemplated in the court’s order. However, neither the propriety of the method of service set forth in the order, nor the validity of the service in the absence of actual delivery to the defendant, was contested in Kadic or addressed in the U.S. government’s statement of interest in that case. The defendant did assert that he was immune from service of process, an assertion rejected by the Second Circuit.
4 2002 WL 1835608, at *3-5.
5 Statement of Interest of the United States of America (June 1, 2001), Zhou v. Li Peng, 2002 WL 1835608 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2002) (citations and footnote omitted).
6 Id. at 7.
7 Id. at 9.
8 Id. at 9-10.
9 2002 WL 1835608, at *14-15 (citations and footnote omitted).