Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T02:14:38.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Philip Morris Brands Sàrl v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2017

Nicole D. Foster*
Affiliation:
University of the West Indies, Barbados

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States, Mar. 18, 1958, 17 UST 1270, 575 UNTS 159 (both Switzerland and Uruguay are parties); Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings, as amended, Apr. 2006. Both documents are available at https://icsid.worldbank.org.

2 Philip Morris Brands Sàrl, Philip Morris Products S.A., & Abal Hermanos S.A. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7 (July 8, 2016). The arbitrations cited herein are available at http://www.italaw.com. Philip Morris Brands Sàrl is a société à responsabilité limitée and Philip Morris Products S.A. is a société anonyme; both are organized under the laws of Switzerland, with registered offices in Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Abal Hermanos S.A. (Abal) is a sociedad anónima organized under the laws of Uruguay, with its registered office in Montevideo, Uruguay. Philip Morris Brands Sàrl is the direct 100 percent owner of Abal.

3 WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, May 21, 2003, 2302 UNTS 166, available at http://www.who.int/fctc/en. Uruguay became a party on Sept. 9, 2004; Switzerland signed on June 24, 2004, but has not yet ratified.

4 The panel's decision on jurisdiction of July 2, 2013, is reported by Borzu Sabati and Kabir Duggal at 108 AJIL 67 (2014).

5 Agreement Concerning the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments, Switz.-Uru., Art. 10, Oct. 7, 1988 (entered into force Apr. 22, 1991), at http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/3121 [hereinafter Switz.-Uru. BIT].

6 E.g., Protocol on Harmonization of Normson Intellectual Property in Mercosur [Mercado Común del Sur], in Matters of Trademarks, Indications of Source and Appellations of Origin, Art. 11, Aug. 5, 1995, 2145 UNTS 438 (trademark holder's exclusive right of use to a registered trademark); Convention on Commercial and Industrial Trademarks [Montevideo Tratado sobre Marcas de Comercio y de Fábrica], Art. 2, Jan. 16, 1889, 18 Nouveau Recueil Général (Martens 2d ser.) 453 (1893) (ownership of a trademark or trade name includes the right to use it); Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, Apr. 15, 1994, 1869 UNTS 299, 33 ILM 1197 (1994) (various provisions) [hereinafter TRIPS].

7 TRIPS, supra note 6, Art. 20.

8 Quoting Elettronica Sicula S.p.a. (ELSI) (U.S. v. It.), 1989 ICJ REP. 15, 76, para. 128 (July 20).

9 Footnote omitted (quoting Counter-memorial of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Philip Morris Brands Sàrl v. Uruguay, para. 2.42 (Oct. 13, 2014) (not publicly available); and Electrabel S.A. v. Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/19, Jurisdiction, Applicability and Liability, para. 8.35 (Nov. 30, 2012), respectively).

10 Quoting Glamis Gold Ltd. v. United States, para. 805 (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. June 8, 2009).

11 Switz.-Uru. BIT, supra note 5, Art. 3(1).

12 Australia—Certain Measures Concerning Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Other Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to Tobacco Products and Packaging, WTO Doc. WT/DS435, WT/DS441, WT/DS458, & WT/DS467 (panel composed May 5, 2014).