Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T15:27:46.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Passports—control of issuance and use—passport as exit permit—area restrictions on travel by United States nationals—necessity ofappropriate assurances concerning conditions and restrictions onuse of passport—right to travel to restricted area without passport

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 E.g. Kent v. Dulles, 357 TJ. S. 116 (1958), 53 A.J.I.L. 171 (1959) (freedom to travel is protected by Fifth Amendment and may only be regulated by Congressional act); Zemel v. Eusk, 381 TJ. S. 1 (1965), 59 A.J.I.L. 935 (1965) (Secretary of State may restrict travel to designated areas in the interest of foreign policy); United States V. Laub, 385 TJ. S. 475 (1967), 61 A.J.I.L. 808 (1967) (travel to restricted areas without specially validated passport is not a criminal offense) (court's footnotes omitted).

2 The action began under a regulation which was modified in 1966, 31 Fed. Eeg. 13544 (Oct. 20, 1966), 22 C.KE. §51.74 (1967). As the basic issue was the samo under both regulations, the court did not order a remand of the Lynd case for proceedings under the terms of the new regulation. 389 I\2d 940 at 943.

3 389 F.2d 940 at 943-944.

4 Ibid. 947-948.

5 Ibid. 949.