Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:23:20.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orvis v. Brownell, 73 S.Ct. 596; 345 U. S. 183

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

William W. Bishop Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , July 1953 , pp. 492 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 12 U.S.C.A. §95a, note; see 5 Fed. Reg. 1400.

2 Explaining the difference in effect, Justice Jackson said: “… if the attachment and judgment create an interest in the property which can be retrieved from the Custodian under $9 (a), the judgment will be paid in full. On the other hand, if it is only an allowable debt under $34, unless granted a priority it apparently will be paid only in part, since it appears claims against the Japanese nationals considerably exceed the funds in the Custodian’s hands.”

3 Douglas and Frankfurter, JJ., dissented, and Clark, J., took no part in the case.