Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T09:41:07.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Consular Conventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Charles Cheney Hyde
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 1921 , pp. 62 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Rocca v. Thompson, 223 U. S. 317, affirming In the Matter of the Estate of Ghio, 157 Calif. 552. Cf. In re Wyman, 191 Mass. 276; Carpigiani v. Hall, 172 Ala. 287.

2 See, also, Article VI of treaty with Persia, of December 13, 1856; also Article XXXIII. paragraph 10, of treaty with Salvador of December 6, 1870.

3 Declared . MrCoudert, Frederic R. , with reference to the case of Rocca v. Thompson, 223 U. S. 317: "We cannot feel that the court had any real doubt as to the constitutionality of a treaty granting to consuls the right to administer upon the estates of their deceased nationals for the benefit of foreign heirs." Google Scholar (Columbia Law Rev., XIII, 181, 185.)

4 252 U. S. 416.