No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Interpretation of “Rights of Custody” Under Hague Convention on Child Abduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2004
References
1 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Oct. 25,1980, TIAS 11, 670, 1343 UNTS 98 [hereinafter Hague Convention].
2 See id., Arts. 12, 13, 20.
3 42 U.S.C. §§11601–11610 (2000).
4 See Furnes v. Reeves, 362 F.3d 702, 704–05 (11th Cir. 2004) (quoting the decision of the Bergen City Court in Norway).
5 Act No. 7 of 8 April 1981 Relating to Children and Parents (The Children Act), at <http://www.lovdata.no/info/ueng.html> .
6 Id. §30.
7 Id. §35(b).
8 Id. §43.
9 362 F.3d at 712 (quoting Hague Convention Articles 3 and 5, and 42 U.S.C. §11603(e)(1)(A)).
10 Id. at 712–14.
11 Id. at 717–18.
12 Id. at 719–22. The court cited Fawcett v. McRoberts, 326 F.3d 491 (4th Cir. 2003), Gonzalez v. Gutierrez, 311 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2002), and Croll v. Croll, 229 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2000).
13 362 F.3d at 724.