Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T02:54:14.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gmo. Niehaus & Co. v. United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Alona E. Evans*
Affiliation:
Of the Board of Editors

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 50 U.S.C. App. §§ļ1-40.

2 157 F. Supp. 428 (Ct. CI., 1957); 170 F. Supp. 419 (Ct. CI., 1959), 53 A.J.I.L. 962 (1959).

3 6 TJ. S. Treaties 4411; 332 U.N. Treaty Series 219; 49 A.JJX. Supp. 100 (1955).

4 373 F. 2d 944 at 957.

5 Ibid.

6 United States v. Algemene Kunstzijde Unie, 226 F.2d 115, 118 (C.A. 4, 1955), cert, denied, 350 U.S. 969, 76 S.Ct. 433, 100 L.Ed. 841 (1956), involved a vesting order entered into by agreement, and the decision was limited to that special circumstance [Footnote by the Court, 373 F. 2d 944, at 960].

7 373 F. 2d 944 at 959-960 (emphasis supplied by Court).

8 U.S.C. App.§§ 7(c), 9(a), 23.