Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T00:37:36.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

General Report on Procedure*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
League of Nations: Committee of Experts for the Progressive Codification of International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Publications of the League of Nations. V. Legal. 1927. V. 2.

References

page 39 note 1 These figures do not take account of the replies received after the Committee’s session, namely, from Egypt, which replied to all seven questionnaires and, subject to certain observations in regard to the first five, offered no objection to the consideration of any of the seven subjects; from Guatemala, which promised a reply later; from New Zealand, which desired to be associated with the replies forwarded by Great Britain; from Turkey, which desired “at present only to follow the course of the work carried out” and to receive any further documents published on the subject; and from Haiti which, confining its reply to the question of the Responsibility of States for Damage done in their Territories to the Person or Property of Foreigners,” raised no objection to the consideration of that subject.

page 39 note 2 See document printed supra, p. 4.