Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T19:42:05.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fllipinas Compañia de Seguros V. Christern, Huenefeld & Co., Inc.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

William W. Bishop Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 1952 , pp. 163 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Ms. copy of opinion supplied by Dr. Martin Domke.

1 332 U. S. 480 (1947); this JOURNAL, Vol. 42 (1948), p. 470.

2 The court quoted at length from a paper on “Enemy Corporations” by Dr. Martin Domke, presented to the Second International Conference of the Legal Profession, The Hague, 1948, and published in revised form in International Law Quarterly, Vol. 3 (1950), p. 52. It also stated that in Haw Pia v. China Banking Corp., this JOURNAL, Vol. 43 (1949), p. 821, it had held that company to be “ ‘enemy’ as used in the Trading with the Enemy Acts of civilized countries not only because it was incorporated under the laws of an enemy country but because it was controlled by enemies.”