Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T21:28:24.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Effectivity” in International Law: Self-Empowerment against Epistemological Claustrophobia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jean d’Aspremont*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, the University of Amsterdam, the Manchester International Law Centre
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

When we think of “effectivity,” we usually come to think of a pragmatic and factual construction. The idea of effectivity, however, is anything but concrete and raises a variety of questions of legal theory, legal philosophy, epistemology, and theory of knowledge. It should also be highlighted that from a linguistic standpoint the word effectivity does not exist in British English. The attachment of the International Court of Justice to her Majesty’s English explains that the World Court uses the French word (effectivité) when it seeks to refer to effectivity. These linguistic debates, however, matter less than the semantics and especially less than the consensus that effectivity ought to be opposed to “effectiveness.”

Type
Symposium: The Idea of Effective International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2014

References

1 Padmanabhan, Vijay, The Idea of Effective International Law: Continuing the Discussion, 108 AJIL Unbound 91 (2014)Google Scholar.

2 Shaw, Gary J., The Idea of Effective International Law, ASIL Cables (Apr. 11, 2014)Google Scholar.