Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T13:02:23.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments by Andreas F. Lowenfeld

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Second Session
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Lowenfeld, and Mendelsohn, , “The United States and the Warsaw Convention,” 80 Harvard Law Rev. 497, 549-550 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lowenfeld, , “The Warsaw Convention and the Washington Compromise,” 70 J. Royal Aeronautical Soc. 1061, 1063 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 For this and similar episodes, see 6 Whiteman, Digest of International Law 799-820 (1968).

3 Olympic Airways v. Panlchi and Giovine, 32 Rev. Générale de l’Air 356 (Cour d’Appel Paris, 1969).

4 Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, Sec. 1111, 49 U.S.C. 1511 (1964).

5 392 U.S. 1 (1968).

6 392 U.S. 40 (1968). The third case, in which certiorari was denied over the dissents of Justice Fortas and Chief Justice Warren, is Wainwright v. City of New Orleans, 392 U.S. 598 (1968).

7 International Coffee Organization, Res. 117 (ICO Doc. No. ICC-8-Res. 117E (1966)).

8 International Coffee Agreement, 1968, Art. 45, 19 U.S.T. 6333, T.I.A.S., No. 6584 (Dec. 30, 1968).

9 Law of Sept. 16, 1969, reproduced in 8 Int. Legal Materials 1175 (1969).