Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:01:25.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asserted Jurisdiction of the Italian Court of Cassation Over the Court of Appeal of the Free Territory of Trieste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Charles Fairman
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 1951 , pp. 541 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1951

References

1 Dept. of State, Treaties and Other International Acts Series, No. 1648; this JOURNAL, Supp., Vol. 42 (1948), p. 47.

2 Dept. of State Bulletin, Vol. XVIII, No. 456 (March 28, 1948), p. 425.

3 Treaties and Other International Acts Series, No. 1604.

4 Dept. of State Publication 2669 (European Series 17), p. 76.

5 Allied Military Government Gazette, Venezia Giulia, No. 1, p. 3.

6 Ibid., p. 32.

7 Review of Allied Military Government and of the Allied Control Commission in Italy, Allied Commission APO 394 (1945), p. 45.

8 Dept. of State Publication 2562 (Executive Agreement Series 501).

9 Allied Military Government Official Gazette, British-United States Zone, Free Territory of Trieste, Vol. I, No. 1, p. 1.

10 Report of the Administration of the British-United States Zone of the Free Territory of Trieste, Report No. 1, p. 7.

11 Report No. 9, Oct. 1 to Dee. 31, 1949, p. 8. So too Report No. 10, 1950, p. 7.

12 Discussed in General Airey's reports, and summarized in Trieste Handbook 1950, issued by the Information and Public Relations Division of the AMG.

13 Published in the Official Gazette, supra, note 9.

14 Cass. civ. I. 20.9.48, n. 1623. Giurisprudenza Completa della Corte Suprema di Cassazione, 1948, 3° Quad., p. 1197, No. 2324; and 1949, 1° Quad., p. 236, No. 42.

15 Cass. civ. I, 11.10.48, n. 1725, ibid., 1948, 3° Quad., p. 741, No. 1774.

16 Cass. civ. I, 20.8.49, n. 2366, ibid., 1949, 2° Quad., p. 783, No. 1916.

17 Cass. civ. Sez. Un., 15.11.48, n. 1823, ibid., 1948, 3° Quad., p. 684, No. 1660.

18 As bearing upon the psychological situation, reference should be made to the address of Professor Ermanno Cammarata, Hector of the University of Trieste, at the opening of the academic year on Dec. 4, 1949, published in the Giornale del Lunedi of Dee. 5. It argued that the words “Italian sovereignty … shall be terminated upon the coming into force of the present Treaty” really did not mean “shall be extinguished”; that the extinction of sovereignty was conditioned on the actual setting up of the anticipated government of the Free Territory, and that Trieste was still subject to Italian sovereignty. The Court of Cassation, in the decisions here discussed, does not found its reasoning on the “Cammarata thesis.”

19 Cass. civ. Sez. Un., 26.9.50, n. 2552. Foro Italiano, 1950, I, p. 1129.

20 Cass. civ. Sez. Un., 15.3.51, n. 658, ibid., 1951, I, 282.

21 36 Stat. 2277, 2306.