No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Annex: Analyses of replies received from Governments to Questionnaires Nos. 1 to 7
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- League of Nations: Committee of Experts for the Progressive Codification of International Law
- Information
- American Journal of International Law , Volume 22 , Issue S5: Supplement: Codification of International Law , January 1928 , pp. 5 - 38
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1928
References
page 6 note 1 Also Egypt, whose reply was received after the Committee’s session.
page 7 note 1 Also New Zealand, whose reply was received after the Committee’s session.
page 8 note 1 Also Egypt and New Zealand, whose replies were received after the Committee’s session.
page 14 note 1 Also Egypt, whoee reply was received after the Committee’s Session.
page 15 note 1 The replies from Egypt and Italy, received after the date of Professor Diena’s statement, were also favourable.
page 15 note 2 Also New Zealand and Haiti whose replies were received after the Committee’s session.
page 20 note 1 Also Egypt, whose reply was received after the Committee’s session.
page 22 note 1 Also Egypt, whose reply was received after the Committee’s session.
page 22 note 2 Also New Zealand, whose reply was received after the Committee’s session.
page 23 note 1 Also Egypt, whose reply was received after the Committee’s session.
page 24 note 1 Also New Zealand, whose reply was received after the Committee’s session.
page 25 note 1 Also Egypt and New Zealand, whose replies were received after the Committee’s session.
page 27 note 1 Also Egypt and New Zealand, whose replies were received after the Committee’s session.
page 35 note 1 Also Egypt and New Zealand, whose replies were received after the Committee’s session
page 35 note 2 Also New Zealand, whose reply was received after the Committee’s session.