Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T15:48:21.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The United States Senate and the Permanent Court of International Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Senate Document 45, 69th Congress, 1st Session. See Supplement to this Journal, p. 73.

2 Senate Document 309, 67th Congress, 4th Session. Reprinted in this Journal, Vol. 17, p. 332.

3 See, however, the writer's suggestion in the American Bar Association Journal, February, 1922, p. 85.

4 Publications of the Court, Series B, No. 5, p. 27.

5 League of NationsOfficial Journal, June, 1923, p. 608.

6 Ibid., August, 1923, pp. 881-883, 935. See also, Hudson, , The Advisory Opinions of the Permanent Court of International Justice, International Conciliation, No. 214, November, 1925, pp. 347-351.Google Scholar

7 League of Nations Official Journal, October,1925, pp. 1379 ff.

8 For other such instances, see Moore, John Bassett, “Treaties and Executive Agreements”, 20 Political Science Quarterly, 385, 408-417; Google Scholar Barnett, James F., “International Agreements without the Advice and Consent of the Senate”, 15 Yale Law Journal, 77-78.Google Scholar

9 36 Stat. at Large, p. 2240.

10 U. S. Treaty Series, No. 711.

11 U. S. Treaty Series, Nos. 674 (Great Britain), 679 (France), 680 (Norway), 682 (Netherlands), 683 (Japan), 708 (Sweden).