Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-29T17:32:37.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stegeman v. United States. 425 5.2d 984

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 211 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1971 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 425 F.2d 984 at 985.

2 Ibid. “Section 18(a) of the Act, 11 U.S.C. §41(a), provides for service of an involuntary petition by publication ‘in the same manner as provided by law for notice by publication in suits to enforce a legal or equitable lien . . .’ where personal service ‘cannot be made’ within ten days.” Footnote by court, ibid. 987. Other footnotes by court omitted.

3 In Blackmer, the Supreme Court said: “The jurisdiction of the United States over its absent citizen, so far as the binding effect of its legislation is concerned, is a jurisdiction in personam, as he is personally bound to take notice of the laws that are applicable to him and to obey them.” Quoted by court, ibid. 985, from 284 U.S. 421 at 438. Reprinted in 26 A.J.I.L. 611 (1932).

4 425 F.2d 984 at 986.