Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T00:14:11.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconceiving Reality: Women and International Law. (Studies in Transnational Legal Policy No. 25.) Edited by Dorinda G. Dallmeyer. Washington: The American Society of International Law, 1993. Pp. xiv, 274. Index. $20 plus 20% shipping & handling.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Martti Koskenniemi
Martti Koskenniemi*
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 227 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See 1993–94 Y.B. ICJ. The only female ad hoc judge has been Mme. Bastid, elected by Tunisia in the 1982 Libya-Tunisia Continental Shelf case.

2 See The Work of the International Law Commission 133–36 (4th ed. 1988).

3 See, e.g., Carol Smart, Feminism and the Power of Law 86–87 (1989). Useful earlier writings on international law and feminism include Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkjn, & Shelley Wright, Feminist Approaches to International Law, 85 AJIL 613 (1991), and a number of articles in 12 Austl. Y.B. Int’l L. (1992).

4 See Smart, supra note 3, at 144–59.

5 For an analysis of the two strands of this internationalist mainstream, see David Kennedy, The International Style in Postwar Law and Policy, 7 Utah L. Rev. 7 (1994). For an earlier discussion, see Hersch Lauterpacht, The Grotian Tradition in International Law, 23 Brit. Y.B. Int’l L. 1 (1946).

6 See Deborah L. Rhode, Feminism and the State, 107 Harv. L. Rev. 1181, 1191–1208 (1994).

7 I am uncertain about the relation of this view to “liberal internationalism,” which also seeks to penetrate the formal veil of statehood and adjust a state’s legal position vis-à-vis other states by reference to the nature of its domestic political structure. See Anne-Marie Burley, Law among Liberal States: Liberal Internationalism and the Act of State Doctrine, 92 Colum. L. Rev. 1907 (1992), and Toward an Age of Liberal Nations, 33 Harv. Int’l L.J. 393–405 (1992). See also Fernando R. Teson, The Kantian Theory of International Law, 92 Colum. L. Rev. 53 (1992).

8 See, e.g., Mannaraswamighala S. Rajan, The Expanding Jurisdiction of the United Nations (1982).

9 Declaration of the UNSC Summit Meeting, UN Doc. S/23500 (Jan. 31, 1992), reprinted in 31 ILM 758 (1992).

10 Thus hinting, I suppose, at the possibility of enforcement action under chapter VII against patriarchal societies!

11 Cf. Catherine A. Mackinnon, Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law 21–31 (1987).

12 See Martti Koskenniemi, The Politics of International Law, 1 Eur. J. Int’l L. 4, 27–32 (1990).