No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
National City Bank of New York v. Republic of China
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 April 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000768795/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000768795a.jpg)
- Type
- Judicial Decisions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1955
References
1 Reed, Burton and Clark, JJ., dissented.
2 48 A.J.I.L. 332 (1954).
3 In a footnote, the Supreme Court indicated that the counterclaims had been confined to a set-off “as a result of the accepted jurisprudence of sovereign immunity.”
4 Footnotes omitted.