Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T02:03:06.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles. By Campbell McLachlan, Laurence Shore, and Matthew Weiniger. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. Pp. xlix, 474. Index. $275.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

John R. Crook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 102 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 390 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Icsid, Annual Report 2006 at 3 Google Scholar; Icsid, Annual Report 2007 at 3 Google Scholar, both available at <http://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet> (follow “About ICSID” hyperlink).

2 Luke, Eric Peterson, Investment Treaty News: 2006—A Year in Review (International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2007)Google Scholar, at <http://www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?id=929>.

3 See Andrea, K. Bjorklund, Investment Treaty Arbitral Decisions as Jurisprudence Constante , in International Economic Law: The State and Future of the Discipline 265 (Colin, B. Picker, Isabella, D. Bunn, & Douglas, W. Arner eds., 2008)Google Scholar.

4 CME Czech Republic v. Czech Republic, Partial Award (Uncitral Sept. 13, 2001)Google Scholar, available at <http://ita.law.uvic.ca/documents/CME–2001PartialAward.pdf>.

5 Lauder v. Czech Republic, Final Award (UNCITRAL Sept. 3, 2001)Google Scholar, available at <http://ita.law.uvic.ca/documents/LauderAward.pdf>.

6 Barcelona Traction, Light & Power Co. (Belg. v. Spain), Second Phase, 1970 ICJ Rep. 3 (Feb. 5)Google Scholar.

7 Tokios Tokelés v. Ukraine, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID No. ARB/02/18 (Apr. 29, 2004), 20 ICSID Rev. 205 (2005)Google Scholar.

8 Loewen Group, Inc. v. United States, ICSID No. ARB(AF)/98/3, para. 225 (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. June 26, 2003), 42 ILM 811, 847 (2003)Google Scholar, available at <http://www.state.gov/s/l/c3755.htm>.

9 Aguas del Tunari v. Republic of Bolivia, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, ICSID No. ARB/02/3 (Oct. 21, 2005), 20 ICSID Rev. 450 (2005)Google Scholar.

10 Fedax N.V. v. Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, ICSID No. ARB/96/3 (July 11, 1997), 37 ILM 1378 (1998)Google Scholar.

11 Mondev Int’l Ltd. v. United States, ICSID No. ARB(AF)/99/2 (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. Oct. 11, 2002), 42 ILM 85 (2003)Google Scholar, available at <http://www.state.gov/s/l/c3758.htm>.

12 See Jan, Paulsson, Denial of Justice in International Law (2005)Google Scholar.

13 Maffezini v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID No. ARB/97/77 (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. Nov. 13, 2000), 16 Icsid Rev. 248 (2001), 124 ILR 35 Google Scholar.

14 Amoco Int’l Fin. Co. v. Iran, 15 Iran–U.S. Cl. Trib. Rep. 189 (1987)Google Scholar.