No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
In Re Lo Dolce
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS000293000022616X/resource/name/firstPage-S000293000022616Xa.jpg)
- Type
- Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1953
References
1 15 Stat. 629, 1 Malloy’s Treaties 966. Although the court does not mention the fact, in Art. I of the treaty the parties agree to extradite persons convicted of or charged with the crimes specified, “committed within, the jurisdiction of one of the contracting parties.” [Italics supplied.]
2 61 Stat. 1245, T.I.A.S., No. 1648, this Journal, Supp., Vol. 42 (1948), p. 47. Art. 44 provides that each Allied or Associated Power will notify Italy “which of its prewar bilateral treaties with Italy it desires to keep in force or revive.”
3 See also Be Government of India and Mubarik Ali Ahmed, [1952] 1 All Eng. L. R. 1060 (Q.B. Apr. 4, 1952), on extradition from England to India of a Pakistan national under the British statutes, kept in force despite India’s becoming a republic within the Commonwealth.