Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T19:45:46.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Rights in Global Politics. Edited by Tim Dunne and Nicholas Wheeler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Pp. xi, 328. Index. £42.50, cloth; £15.95, paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Christine M. Chinkin
Christine M. Chinkin*
Affiliation:
Of the Board of Editors
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 472 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Alston, Philip & Crawford, James, The Future of Unhuman Rights Treaty Monitoring (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 See, e.g., Kingsbury, Benedict, The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law, 19 Mich. J. Int’l L. 345 (1998)Google Scholar; Commitment and Compliance (Shelton, Dinah ed., 2000)Google Scholar (reviewed by Douglas, M. Johnston, 95 AJIL (forthcoming 2001)).Google Scholar

3 Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, GA Res. 54/4 (Oct. 15,1999) (entered into force Dec. 22, 2000).

4 Brown draws upon the work of philosopher Richard Rorty in rejecting the epistemological foundations of human rights while accepting the importance of “sentimental education” (p. 120)—that is, asserting values in face of wrongs.

5 See also, for example, Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Question of Consensus (Abdullahi, An-Naimed., 1992)Google Scholar, in which cross-cultural dialogue is conceived as integral to the process of internalizing rights.

6 See also Falk, Richard, The Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion and the New Jurisprudence of Global Civil Society, 7 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 333 (1997).Google Scholar

7 Richard, A. Falk, NATO’s Kosovo Intervention: Kosovo, World Order, and the Future of International Law, 93 AJIL 847 (1999).Google Scholar

8 Information on the special session, held from June 5-9, 2000, is available online at <http://www.un.org/womenwatch/confer/>.