No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Compulsory Arbitration at the Second Hague Conference1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2017
Extract
It was in the natural course of things that the Second Conference of 1907, called to elaborate the work of 1899, should deal with the problem of extending arbitration along the lines indicated in the Russian proposal of 1899, and that the question should be reconsidered as to whether the nations could not and should not obligate themselves to refer disputes to arbitration.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1910
Footnotes
1
The above is a translation of an extract from an article on International arbitration, contributed to Herder’s Staatslexikon, 3d edition, second volume, by Dr. Heinrich Lammasch, Professor of International Law in the University of Vienna.
It is not the custom of the Journal to publish material which has appeared elsewhere, but as Dr. Lammasch is Umpire in the North Atlantic Coast Fisheries Arbitration between Great Britain and the United States, his views on arbitration are of peculiar interest. The Journal therefore translates and publishes the article, which is as valuable as it is interesting. — J. B. S.
References
2 See Von Merey’s statement previously referred to in the text.
3 Cf. Bourgeois’ speech in the report of Charles Dupuy to the French Senate, 1907, No. 337, page 77, and French Yellow Book, page 116.