No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comments by Andreas F. Lowenfeld
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000261654/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000261654a.jpg)
- Type
- Second Session
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1971
References
1 See, e.g., Lowenfeld, and Mendelsohn, , “The United States and the Warsaw Convention,” 80 Harvard Law Rev. 497, 549-550 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lowenfeld, , “The Warsaw Convention and the Washington Compromise,” 70 J. Royal Aeronautical Soc. 1061, 1063 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 For this and similar episodes, see 6 Whiteman, Digest of International Law 799-820 (1968).
3 Olympic Airways v. Panlchi and Giovine, 32 Rev. Générale de l’Air 356 (Cour d’Appel Paris, 1969).
4 Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, Sec. 1111, 49 U.S.C. 1511 (1964).
5 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
6 392 U.S. 40 (1968). The third case, in which certiorari was denied over the dissents of Justice Fortas and Chief Justice Warren, is Wainwright v. City of New Orleans, 392 U.S. 598 (1968).
7 International Coffee Organization, Res. 117 (ICO Doc. No. ICC-8-Res. 117E (1966)).
8 International Coffee Agreement, 1968, Art. 45, 19 U.S.T. 6333, T.I.A.S., No. 6584 (Dec. 30, 1968).
9 Law of Sept. 16, 1969, reproduced in 8 Int. Legal Materials 1175 (1969).