No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Claims of Dual Nationals and the Development of Customary International Law: Issues Before the Iran—United States Claims Tribunal. By Mohsen Aghahosseini. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007. Pp. ix, 302. $136, €95.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Recent Books on International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2008
References
1 See, e.g., Alfred, Michael Boll, Multiple Nationality and International Law (2007)Google Scholar; Rights and Duties of Dual Nationals: Evolution and Prospects (David, A. Martin & Kay, Hailbronner eds., 2003)Google Scholar; David, A. Martin, New Rules on Dual Nationality for a Democratizing Globe: Between Rejection and Embrace , 14 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 1 (1999)Google Scholar; Peter, J. Spiro, Dual Nationality and the Meaning of Citizenship , 46 Emory L.J. 1411 (1997)Google Scholar.
2 Jessurun, d'Oliveira, Book Review, 101 AJIL 922 (2007)Google Scholar.
3 See, e.g., George, H. Aldrich, The Jurisprudence of The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal 54-79 (1996)Google Scholar; Charles, N. Brower & Jason, D. Brueschke, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal 32-42, 288-320 (1998)Google Scholar; David, J. Bederman, Eligible Claimants Before the Iran—United States Claims Tribunal , in The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: its Contribution to the Law of State Responsibility 47 (Richard, B. Lillich & Daniel, B. Magraw, eds. 1998)Google Scholar; Peter, E. Mahoney, The Standing of Dual Nationals Before the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal , 24 VA. J. Int'l L. 695 (1984)Google Scholar.
4 At one time, I advised Aghahosseini that the title left this impression and that a general book on dual nationality might be preferable. For these modest suggestions, which he did not accept, he gave me an acknowledgment in the book.
5 Feller, A. H., The Mexican Claims Commissions, 1923-1934, at 98 (1935)Google Scholar.
6 Mahoney, supra note 2, at 705; Edwin, M. Borchard, The Diplomatic Protection Of Citizens Abroad 588 (1916)Google Scholar.
7 See authorities cited in Mahoney, supra note 2, at 700-08.
8 Nottebohm (Liech. v. Guat.), 1955 ICJ Rep. 4 (Apr. 6)Google Scholar; see Ian, Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law 395-406 (6th ed. 2003)Google Scholar.
9 Iran v. United States, 36 Iran-U.S. CI. Trib. Rep. 84 (2000) (Case A-11).
10 Esphahanian v. BankTejarat, 2 Iran-U.S. CI. Trib. Rep. 157 (1983); Golpira v. Iran, 2 Iran-U.S. CI. Trib. Rep. 171 (1983).
11 Iran v. United States 5 Iran-U.S. CI. Trib. Rep. 251, 265 (1984) (Case A-18).
12 E.g., Mergé (U.S. v.Italy), 14R.I.A.A.236(1955); Rambaldi (Fr. v. Italy), 13 R.I.A.A. 786 (1957).
13 Statement by the Prime Minister of Iran, Mr. Musavi, Regarding the Tribunal's Decision in Case A/18, 5 Iran-U.S. CI. Trib. Rep. 428, 428, 430 (1984).
14 Iran v. United States, 5 Iran-U.S. CI. Trib. Rep. at 266.
15 Mat 336-37.
16 See, e.g., Declaration of Hamid Bahrami-Ahmadi with Respect to the Legal Opinion Issued by Two Members of Chamber Two in Connection with Case No. 298, 14 Iran-U.S. CI. Trib. Rep. 8 (1987).
17 Under Article 111(3) of the Claims Settlement Declaration, the governments “presented” only the claims of nationals that are under $250,000.
18 Iran v. United States, 5 Iran-U.S. CI. Trib. Rep. at 265-66.
19 Id. at 272.
20 Brower & Brueschke, supra note 2, at 319.