No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000095828/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000095828a.jpg)
- Type
- Editorial Comment
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1912
Footnotes
See Bureau’s Conflit Italo-Colombien (Affaire Cerruti), 1899 (strongly Colombian); Darras’ Certains Dangers de l’arbitrage international in the Revue générale de droit International Public, for 1899, pp. 533-552; Hagerup’s Affaire Cerruti — Sentence Arbitrate de 6 Juillet 1911, ibid, 1912, pp. 268-274.
References
2 See the text of the convention, Supplement p. 238.
3 See Judicial Decisions, this Journal, p. 1003.
4 For text of this instrument see Judicial Decisions, this Journal, p. 1015. For a scathing criticism of the award, see Pierantoni’s “Nullité d’un arbitrage international “in the Revue de droit international et de législation comparée for 1898, Vol. XXX, pp. 445 et seq.
5 See the correspondence on this point in Foreign Relations of the United States (1898), pp. 251-273.
6 Mr. Sherman to Señor Rengifo, For. Rel. of the U. S. 1898, p. 251.
7 See Señor Rengifo’s notes to Messrs, Olney and Sherman, dated respectively, Washington, March 3, May 1, 1897, in For. Rel. of U. S. (1898), pp. 246-249.
8 See correspondence in Bruneau’s Conflit Italo-Colombien, pp. 115-125.