Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:08:43.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental policy and swine manure management Waste not or want not?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Dana L. Hoag  and
Fritz M. Roka
Dana L. Hoag
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523;
Fritz M. Roka
Affiliation:
Research Associate, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Get access

Abstract

Livestock production and manure handling decisions often have been treated in the literature as separate enterprises. Policymakers, too, have ignored the interactive nature of manure management by focusing on land application for nutrient disposal. This study outlines a systems approach to describe the interrelated decisions producers face, using examples from North Carolina and Iowa that show how producers' attitudes toward manure management lead them to handle manure differently in different regions. In North Carolina, nutrients in manure are “not wanted.” There are economic incentives to treat manure, thus reducing its nutrient content, and to apply it on as little land as possible. In Iowa, nutrients are “not wasted.” Producers conserve the nutrients in manure and use them more fully, applying manure to higher value crops such as corn. Policies that influence manure management can be made more effective by accounting for the differences in producers' incentives to waste or want the nutrients.

Keywords

hogsmanure handlingnutrient managementland applicationNorth CarolinaIowa
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 163 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Barker, J. 1991. Livestock manure characteristics. Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
2.Brown, A.B., and Johnson, T.. 1992. Optimal control in turkey feeding. Presented at the Agricultural Economics Workshop, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
3.Chase, C., Duffy, M., and Lotz, W.. 1991. Economic impact of varying swine manure application rates on continuous corn. J. Soil and Water Conservation 46:460–464.Google Scholar
4.Chavas, J-P., Kliebenstein, J., and Crenshaw, T.D.. 1985. Modeling dynamic agricultural production response: the case of swine production. Amer. J. Agric. Economics 67:636–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Cox, V. 1994. Cost analysis of swine waste irrigation systems. Unpublished Masters thesis, Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
6.Honeyman, M. 1990. Sustainable swine production in the U.S. Corn Belt. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 6:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Honeyman, M. 1993. Environmentalfriendly swine feed formulation to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus excretion. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 8:128–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Hurt, C. and Zering, K.. 1993. Restructuring the nation's pork industry. NC State Economist, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh.Google Scholar
9.Iowa Department of Natural Resources. 1992. Environmental regulations and guidelines for animal feeding operations in Iowa. Des Moines.Google Scholar
10.Magdoff, F. 1991. Managing nitrogen for sustainable corn systems: Problems and possibilities. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 6:3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Midwest Plan Service (MWPS). 1985. Livestock waste facilities handbook. Iowa State Univ., Ames.Google Scholar
12.North Carolina Dept. of Agriculture. Various years. Annual Summary of Agricultural Statistics. Raleigh.Google Scholar
13.Roka, F. 1993. An economic analysis of joint production relationships between pork and swine manure. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
14.Safley, L.M. 1992. Unpublished data, Dept. of Biological and Agric. Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
15.Skewes, R.A. 1986. An economic analysis of slaughter hog market weights. Unpublished Masters thesis, Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
16.Zublena, J. 1991. Soilfacts: Nutrient removal by crops in North Carolina. Extension fact sheet AG439-16, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh.Google Scholar