Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:01:20.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Can Systems Theory Do for Archaeology?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Abstract

This paper examines the relevance of systems theory to archaeology. General Systems Theory and Mathematical Systems Theory are considered. Although it is important for archaeologists to look at the materials they study as components of a larger cultural and ecological context, neither version of systems theory can offer archaeologists much help in constructing archaeological theories or in providing models of archaeological explanation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlinski, David 1976 On systems analysis. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth 1972 Economics and general systems. Lazlo 1972:7792.Google Scholar
Buckley, Walter F. 1967 Sociology and modern systems theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Buckley, Walter F. 1968 Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Burks, A. W. 1975a Logic, biology and automata—some historical reflections. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 7:291312.Google Scholar
Burks, A. W. 1975 b Models of deterministic systems. Mathematical Systems Theory 8:295308.Google Scholar
Clarke, David L. 1968 Analytical archaeology. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent 1968 Archeological systems theory and early Mesoamerica. Anthropological Archeology in the Americas. B. J.Meggers, Anthropological Society of Washington, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent 1973 Archeology with a capital S. In Redman 1973:4753.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. and Marcus, J. 1976 Formative Oazaca and the Zapotec cosmos. American Scientist 64:37483.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1965 Aspects of scientific explanation. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lazlo, Ervin 1972 The relevance of general systems theory. Geo. Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, S. 1973 Two points of logic concerning data, hypotheses, general laws, and systems. In Redman 1973:199214.Google Scholar
Marchal, J.H. 1975 The concept of a system. Philosophy of Science 42:44868.Google Scholar
Maruyama, Magorah 1963 The second cybernetics. American Scientist 51:164179.Google Scholar
Meeham, Eugene 1968 Explanation in social science—a system paradigm. The Dorsey Press, Homewood, Illinois.Google Scholar
Miller, James G. 1965 Living systems: cross-level hypothesis. Behavioral Science 10:380411.Google Scholar
Plog, Fred T. 1973 Diachronic anthropology. Redman 1973:18198.Google Scholar
Plog, Fred T. 1975 Systems theory in archeological research. Annual Review of Anthropology. Siegel, B. J., Ed. AnnualReviews, Inc. 4:207224, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
Powers, William T. 1973 Feedback: beyond behaviorism. Science 179:351356.Google Scholar
Rapaport, Anatol T. 1968 Foreword. In Buckley 1968:xiiixxii.Google Scholar
Rapaport, Anatol T. 1972 The search for simplicity. In Lazlo 1972:1320.Google Scholar
Redman, C. L. 1973 Research and theory in current archeology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Steiger, W. L. 1971 Analytical archaeology? Mankind 8:6770.Google Scholar
Tuggle, H. D., A. H., Townsend, T. J., Riley 1972 Laws, systems, and research designs. American Antiquity 37:312.Google Scholar
Watson, P. J., S., Leblanc, and C. L., Redman 1971 Explanation in archeology: an explicitly scientific approach. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
White, Lynn Jr. 1962 Medieval technology and social change. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert 1948 Cybernetics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar