Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:22:48.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revolutionary Developments in Carbon-14 Dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

L. A. Pavlish  and
E. B. Banning
L. A. Pavlish
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Department of Physics, Archaeometry Laboratory
E. B. Banning
Affiliation:
Department of Near Eastern Studies and Department of Physics, Archaeometry Laboratory, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The conventional carbon-14 method relies on the accurate measurement of a beta-ray decay rate to determine the age of the sample. The new method instead uses an ultrasensitive mass spectrometer to count the individual carbon-14 atoms in a sample. The advantages of this approach are many. The problem of cosmic ray background does not arise. Shorter counting times on samples 1,000 times smaller will be possible. One result will be the production of more accurate age determinations. The new method will permit a great expansion in the types of archaeological materials that can be dated because only milligram samples will be required. Research on the design of a dedicated carbon-14 atom counting machine is presently in progress.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 290 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Aitken, M. J. 1978 Archaeological involvements of physics. Physics Reports 400:277–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, H. R., Ball, G. C., Brown, R. M., Burn, N., Davies, W. G., Imahori, Y., and Milton, J. C. D. 1978 Radiocarbon dating experiments with the Chalk River MP tandem accelerator. Proceedings of the First Conference on Radiocarbon Dating with Accelerators, University of Rochester, April 20 and 21: 114-126.Google Scholar
B.-Barratt, P. J. S., Doucas, G., Garman, E. F., Hyder, H. R. McK., Sinclair, D., Hedges, R. E. M., and White, N. R. 1978 Experiments to establish the design of a dedicated tandem accelerator for C dating at Oxford. Proceedings of the First Conference on Radiocarbon Dating with Accelerators, University of Rochester, April 20 and 21.127-151.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. L., Beukens, R. P., Clover, M. R., Elmore, D., Gove, H. E., Kilius, L., Litherland, A. E., and Purser, K. H. 1978 Radiocarbon dating using electrostatic accelerators: dating of milligram samples. Science 201:345–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, C. L., Beukens, R. P., Clover, M. R., Gove, H. E., Liebert, R. B., Litherland, A. E., Purser, K. H., and Sondheim, W. E. 1977 Radiocarbon dating using electrostatic accelerators: negative ions provide the key. Science 198:508–510.Google Scholar
Beukens, R. P. 1978a Carbon-14 dating of milligram samples using a tandem accelerator. Paper presented at the 18th InternationalSymposium on Archaeometry and Archaeological Prospection, 14-17 March, RheinischesLandesmuseum, Bonn.Google Scholar
Beukens, R. P. 1978b Plans for a dedicated tandem accelerator at the University of Toronto. Proceedings of the First Conference on Radiocarbon Dating with Accelerators, University of Rochester, April 20 and 21:251–256.Google Scholar
Beukens, R. P., and Pavlish, L. A. 1978 TL and carbon-14 dating of pottery: archaeometric potential. Paper presented to the Canadian ArchaeologicalAssociation, Quebec, April 29, 1978.Google Scholar
Damon, P. E. 1968 Radiocarbon and climate. Meteorological Monographs 8(30):151–154.Google Scholar
Damon, P. E., Long, A., and Grey, D. C. 1970 Arizona and radiocarbon dates for dendrochronologically dated samples. In Radiocarbon variationsand absolute chronology, edited by Olsson, I. U., pp. 615–618. Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Damon, P. E., Long, A., and Lerman, J. C. 1978 Radiocarbon geophysics and calibration of the radiocarbon time scale. Proceedings of the First Conferenceon Radiocarbon Dating with Accelerators, University of Rochester, April 20 and 21:320–344.Google Scholar
Grootes, P. M. 1977 Thermal diffusion isotopic enrichment and radiocarbon dating beyond 50, 000 years BP. UnpublishedPh.D. dissertation, Department of Physics, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T., and Hedges, R. E. M. 1977 Carbon-14 dating of milligram samples by isotope-enriched mass-spectrometry. Paper presented atthe International Symposium on Archaeometry and Archaeological Prospection, University of Pennsylvaniaand the University Museum, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, March 16, 1977.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T., Hedges, R. E. M., White, N. R., Hyder, H. R. McK., and Sinclair, D. 1978 Plans for Van de Graaff mass spectrometry and laser enrichment of 1 4C at Oxford. Proceedings ofthe First Conference on Radiocarbon Dating with Accelerators, University of Rochester, April 20 and 21: 257–265.Google Scholar
Haynes, C. V. 1978 Applications of radiocarbon dating with accelerators to archaeology and geology. Proceedings of theFirst Conference on Radiocarbon dating with Accelerators, University of Rochester, April 20 and 21: 276–288.Google Scholar
Lerman, J. C, Mook, W. G., and Vogel, J. C. 1970 C-14 in tree rings from different localities. In Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology, edited by Olsson, I. U., pp. 275–301. Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F. 1955 Radiocarbon dating. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Muller, R. A. 1977 Radioisotope dating with a cyclotron. Science 196:489–494.Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., Stephenson, E. J., and Mast, T. S. 1978 Radioisotope dating with an accelerator: a blind measurement. Science 201:347–348.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. E., Stott, W. R., and Korteling, R. G. 1977 Carbon-14: direct detection at natural concentrations. Science 198:507–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oeschger, H., Houtermans, J., Loosli, H., and Wahlen, M. 1970 The constancy of cosmic radiation from isotope studies in meteorites and on the earth. In Radiocarbonvariations and absolute chronology, edited by Olsson, I. U., pp. 487–488. Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Purser, K. H. Liebert, R. B., Litherland, A. E., Beukens, R. P., Gove, H. E., Bennett, C. L., Glover, M. R., and Sondheim, W. E. 1977 An attempt to detect stable negative nitrogen ions from a sputter ion source and some implications ofthe results for the design of tandems for ultra-sensitive carbon analysis. In Proceedings of the Second InternationalConference on Electrostatic Accelerators, Strasbourg, France, Revue de Physique Appliquee 12(10):1487–1492.Google Scholar
Ralph, E. K., and Michael, H. N. 1970 MASCA radiocarbon dates for Sequoia and bristlecone-pine samples. In Radiocarbon variations andabsolute chronology, edited by Olsson, I. U., pp. 619–624. Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. 1969 Yale natural radiocarbon measurements IX. Radiocarbon 2:545–658.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. 1978a The ultimate precision of 1 C dating is determined only by counting statistics. Proceedings of theFirst Conference on Radiocarbon Dating with Accelerators, University of Rochester, April 20 and 21:353–359.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. 1978b Carbon-14 dating: a comparison of beta and ion counting. Science 202:881–883.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1955 Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood. Science 122:415–417.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1970 Bristlecone-pine calibration of the radiocarbon timescale 5200 B.C. to the present. In Radiocarbonvariations and absolute chronology, edited by Olsson, I. U., pp. 303–309. Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
de Vries, H. 1958 Variation in concentration of radiocarbon with time and location on earth. Proceedings, KoninklijkeNederlandse Akademie voor Wetenschappen, Series B61:94–102.Google Scholar