Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T16:00:31.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Berlin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Froelich Rainey ,
Kidder Alfred II ,
Linton Satterthwaite  and
William R. Coe
Froelich Rainey
Affiliation:
The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Kidder Alfred II
Affiliation:
The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Linton Satterthwaite
Affiliation:
The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
William R. Coe
Affiliation:
The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Facts and opinions are given that contest Berlin’s specific condemnation of a single excavation at Tikal, Guatemala, and his general censure of the Tikal Project.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 1967 , pp. 242 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coe, W. R. 1962 A Summary of Excavation and Research at Tikal, Guatemala. American Antiquity, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 479–507. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Coe, W. R. 1965 Tikal, Guatemala and Emergent Maya Civilization. Science, Vol. 147, No. 3664, pp. 1401–1419. Washington.Google Scholar
Shook, E. M. and Kidder, A. II 1961 The Painted Tomb at Tikal. Expedition, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 2–7. Philadelphia.Google Scholar