Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T17:39:38.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF MICA SOURCE SPECIMENS AND ARTIFACTS FROM THE ABBOTT FARM NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK (28ME1)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2017

Matthew T. Boulanger*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, 3225 Daniel Avenue, Dallas, TX 75205, USA
Gregory D. Lattanzi
Affiliation:
Bureau of Archaeology, New Jersey State Museum, 205 West State Street, Trenton, NJ 08625, USA
Cody C. Roush
Affiliation:
Archaeometry Laboratory, University of Missouri Research Reactor, 1513 Research Park Dr., Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Michael D. Glascock
Affiliation:
Archaeometry Laboratory, University of Missouri Research Reactor, 1513 Research Park Dr., Columbia, MO 65211, USA
*
(mboulanger@smu.edu, corresponding author)

Abstract

The Abbott Farm National Historic Landmark is one of the more significant Woodland-period sites in the Northeast. Numerous Hopewellian cultural traits (copper artifacts, cremated burials, exotic cherts, and mica) have been identified at the site. Numerous potential geological sources for the mica artifacts exist in the Mid-Atlantic region. We explore two analytical methods to evaluate the most likely geological sources of the mica artifacts. Source and artifact specimens were analyzed using pXRF as well as neutron activation. Our pXRF data are suggestive, but show high analytical uncertainty. We make several recommendations relevant to future attempts that would use this kind of instrument to study sheet mica. Our neutron activation results are promising and suggest that geochemical sourcing of mica has much potential. Results of both assays suggest that most of the artifact specimens recovered from Abbott Farm share a similar chemistry, and this composition is very similar to mica from southeastern Pennsylvania. A cut-and-drilled pendant exhibits a chemical makeup distinctly different from all other artifacts and source specimens evaluated here. Although our results are preliminary, the application of modern analytical methods to extant archaeological collections has the potential to provide significant new information.

El Abbott Farm National Historic Landmark es uno de los sitios más significativos del período silvícola del noreste de Estados Unidos. Numerosos rasgos culturales (artefactos de cobre, entierros incinerados, sílex exótico y mica) han sido identificados en el sitio. Numerosas fuentes geológicas potenciales para los artefactos de mica existen en la región del Atlántico Medio. Se exploran dos métodos analíticos para evaluar las fuentes más probables de los artefactos de mica. Muestras procedentes de las fuentes y algunos artefactos fueron analizados usando fluorescencia de rayos X portátil (pXRF) así como análisis por activación neutrónica (AAN). Los datos procedentes del análisis por pXRF son sugestivos pero muestran un alto nivel de incertidumbre analítica. Se hacen varias recomendaciones sobre el uso de esta clase de instrumento en investigaciones futuras para estudiar la mica laminada. Los resultados del AAN son prometedores y sugieren que el estudio geoquímico del abastecimiento de mica tiene mucho potencial. Los resultados de ambos ensayos sugieren que la mayoría de los ejemplares de artefactos recobrados del Abbott Farm tienen una composición química parecida que es muy semejante a la mica del sudeste de Pennsylvania. Un pendiente cortado y taladrado muestra una composición química distinta de la de todos los otros artefactos y muestras de fuentes evaluadas aquí. Aunque nuestros resultados sean preliminares, la aplicación de los modernos métodos analíticos a las colecciones arqueológicas existentes tiene el potencial de proporcionar nueva información significativa.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by the Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Abbott, Charles C. 1876 The Stone Age in New Jersey. Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution 1875, pp. 246379. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Abbott, Charles C. 1881 Primitive Industry: Or, Illustrations of the Handiwork, in Stone, Bone and Clay, of the Native Races of the Northern Atlantic Seaboard of America. George A. Bates, Salem, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Bastin, Edson S. 1910 Economic Geology of the Feldspar Deposits of the United States. Bulletin 420. United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Bonomo, Michael F. 2011 Trace Element Geochemical Characterization of Southeastern Pegmatitic Muscovite and Resultant Implications for the Provenancing of Archaeological Mica. Master's thesis. Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
Boulanger, Matthew T., Fehrenbach, Shawn S., and Glascock, Michael D. 2012 Experimental Evaluation of Sample-extraction Methods and the Potential for Contamination in Ceramic Specimens. Archaeometry 55 (5):880892.Google Scholar
Brown, James A., Kerber, Richard A., and Winters, Howard D. 1990 Trade and the Evolution of Exchange Relations at the Beginning of the Mississippian Period. In The Mississippian Emergence, edited by Smith, Bruce D., pp. 251280. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Carpenter, Edmund S. 1950 Four Hopewellian Tumuli in Western New York. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 40:209216.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Edmund S. 1956 The Irvine, Cornplanter and Corydon Mounds, Warren County, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 26:89115.Google Scholar
Cross, Dorothy 1956 Archaeology of New Jersey. Volume 2. The Abbott Farm. Archaeological Society of New Jersey and the New Jersey State Museum, Trenton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Custer, Jay F. 1984 The Paleoecology of the Late Archaic: Exchange and Adaptation. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 53 (3):3247.Google Scholar
Custer, Jay F. 1987 New Perspectives on the Delmarva Adena Complex. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 12:3353.Google Scholar
Custer, Jay F. 1989 Prehistoric Cultures of the Delmarva Peninsula: An Archaeological Study. University of Delaware Press, Newark.Google Scholar
Davis, M. Kathleen, Jackson, Thomas L., Shackley, M. Steven, Teague, Timothy, and Hampel, Joachim H. 2011 Factors Affecting the Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) Analysis of Archaeological Obsidian. In X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) in Geoarchaeology, edited by Shackley, M. Steven, pp. 4564. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Frondel, Clifford 1936 Oriented Inclusions of Tourmaline in Muscovite. American Mineralogist 21:777799.Google Scholar
Gardner, William M. 1982 Early and Middle Woodland in the Middle Atlantic: An Overview. In Practicing Environmental Archaeology, edited by Moeller, Roger W., pp. 5386. Occasional Papers 3. American Indian Archaeological Institute, Washington, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Glascock, Michael D. 1992 Characterization of Archaeological Ceramics at MURR by Neutron Activation Analysis and Multivariate Statistics. In Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, edited by Neff, Hector, pp. 1126. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Glascock, Michael D., and Neff, Hector 2003 Neutron Activation Analysis and Provenance Research in Archaeology. Measurement and Science Technology 14:15161526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Samuel G. 1922 The Mineralogy of Pennsylvania. Special publication 1. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Griffitts, Wallace R., Jahns, Richard H., and Lemke, Richard W. 1953 Mica Deposits of the Southeastern Piedmont; Part 3: Ridgeway-Sandy District, Virginia and North Carolina, and Part 4: Outlying Deposits in Virginia. Geological Survey Professional Paper 248-C. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Griffitts, Wallace R., and Olson, Jerry C. 1953a Mica Deposits of the Southeastern Piedmont; Part 5: Shelby-Hickory District, North Carolina, and Part 6: Outlying Deposits in North Carolina. Geological Survey Professional Paper 248-D. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffitts, Wallace R., and Olson, Jerry C. 1953b Mica Deposits of the Southeastern Piedmont; Part 7: Hartwell District, Georgia and South Carolina, and Part 8: Outlying Deposits in South Carolina. Geological Survey Professional Paper 248-E. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Gunow, Alexander J., and Bonn, Gregory N. 1989 The Geochemistry and Origin of Pegmatites, Cherokee-Pickens District, Georgia. Bulletin 103. Georgia Geologic Survey, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Heinrich, E. William, Klepper, Montis R., and Jahns, Richard H. 1953 Mica Deposits of the Southeastern Piedmont; Part 9: Thomaston-Barnesville District, Georgia, and Part 10: Outlying Deposits in Georgia. Geological Survey Professional Paper 248-F. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Heinrich, E. William, and Olson, Jerry C. 1953 Mica Deposits of the Southeastern Piedmont; Part 11: Alabama District. Geological Survey Professional Paper 248-G. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Hovey, Edmund O. 1895 Notes on Some Specimens of Minerals from Washington Heights, New York City. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 7:341342.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alice M. W., and Speakman, Robert J. 2015 Portable XRF Analysis of Archaeological Sediments and Ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science 53:626638.Google Scholar
Hunter, Richard, Tvaryanas, Damon, Byers, David, and Stewart, R. Michael 2009 The Abbott Farm National Historic Landmark Interpretive Plan Cultural Resource Technical Document, Hamilton Township, Mercer County, Bordentown Township and the City of Bordentown, Burlington County, New Jersey. Hunter Research, Inc. Submitted to County of Mercer. Copies available from the New Jersey State Museum.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Jerome 1961 Archaeology at Tottenville, Staten Island, New York. Bulletin of The Archaeological Society of New Jersey 18–19:16.Google Scholar
Jahns, Richard H., Griffitts, Wallace R., and Heinrich, E. William 1952 Mica Deposits of the Southeastern Piedmont; Part 1: General Features. Geological Survey Professional Paper 248-A. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Jochum, Klaus Peter, Nohl, Uwe, Herwig, Kirstin, Lammel, Esin, Stoil, Brigitte, and Hofmann, Albrecht W. 2007 GeoRem: A New Geochemical Database for Reference Materials and Isotopic Standards. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 29:333338.Google Scholar
Joyce, Arthur A., Sandy, William, and Horan, Sharon 1989 Dr. Charles Conrad Abbott and the Question of Human Antiquity in the New World. Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of New Jersey 44:5969.Google Scholar
Kaeser, Edward J. 1963 The Morris Estate Club Site. The Bulletin of the New York State Archaeological Association 27:1322.Google Scholar
Klein, Cornelius 2002 The 22nd Edition of the Manual of Mineral Science (after James D. Dana). John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Kraft, Herbert C. 1976 The Rosenkrans Site, an Adena-related Mortuary Complex in the Upper Delaware Valley, New Jersey. Archaeology of Eastern North America 4:942.Google Scholar
Kraft, Herbert C. 1993 Dr. Charles Conrad Abbott, New Jersey's Pioneer Archaeologist. Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of New Jersey 48:112.Google Scholar
Lattanzi, Gregory D. 2013 The Value of Reciprocity: Copper, Exchange and Social Interaction in the Middle Atlantic Region of the Eastern Woodlands of North America. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Lattanzi, Gregory D., and Stinchcomb, Gary E. 2015 Isotopic Analysis of Museum-archived Soil Samples from Archaeological Sites: A Case Study Using the Abbott Farm National Historic Landmark, USA. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 4:8694.Google Scholar
Lemke, Richard W., Jahns, Richard H., and Griffitts, Wallace R. 1952 Mica Deposits of the Southeastern Piedmont; Part 2: Amelia District. Geological Survey Professional Paper 248-B. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Luckenbach, Al 2013 A “Delmarva Adena” Mortuary Complex at Pig Point. Maryland Archeology 49 (2):314.Google Scholar
McConaughy, Mark A. 2011 Burial Ceremonialism at Sugar Run Mound (36Wa359), a Hopewellian Squawkie Hill Phase Site, Warren County, Pennsylvania. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 36:73104.Google Scholar
McConaughy, Mark A., and Johnson, Janet 2003 Sugar Run Mound (36Wa359) and Village (36Wa2): Hopewell/Middle Woodland in Warren County, Pennsylvania. In Foragers and Farmers of the Early and Middle Woodland Periods, edited by Raber, Paul and Cowin, Verna, pp. 101116. Recent Research in Pennsylvania Number 3. Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Manchester, James G. 1931 The Minerals of New York City and its Environs. New York Mineralogical Club, New York.Google Scholar
Meltzer, David J. 2015 The Great Paleolithic War: How Science Forged an Understanding of America's Ice Age Past. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Parris, David C., and Williams, Lorraine E. 1986 Possible Sources of Mica from the Abbott Farm Site, Mercer County, New Jersey. Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of New Jersey 40:16.Google Scholar
Pollak, Janet S. 1971 The Abbott Phase: A Hopewellian Manifestation in the Delaware Valley. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Pollak, Janet S. 1976 Middle Woodland Settlement Patterns in the Central Delaware River Valley: The Abbott Phase Components in the Abbott Farm Historic District and Vicinity. Paper presented at the 1976 New Jersey Academy of Science Meeting. Copies available from the New Jersey State Museum, Trenton.Google Scholar
Prothero, Donald R., and Lavin, Lucianne 1990 Chert Petrography and its Potential as an Analytical Tool in Archaeology. In Archaeological Geology of North America, edited by Lasca, Norman P. and Donahue, Jack, pp. 561584. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William A. 1937 Culture Influences from Ohio in New York Archaeology. American Antiquity 2:182194.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William A. 1944 The Pre-Iroquoian Occupations of New York State. Memoir No. 1. Rochester Museum of Arts and Science, Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William A. 1980 The Archaeology of New York State. Revised edition. Harbor Hill Books, Harrison, New York.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William A., and Dragoo, Don W. 1959 The Eastern Dispersal of Adena. American Antiquity 25:4350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackley, M. Steven 2010 Is There Reliability and Validity in Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (PXRF)? SAA Archaeological Record 10 (5):1720, 44.Google Scholar
Silver, Annette L. 1991 The Abbott Interaction Sphere: A Consideration of the Middle Woodland Period in Coastal New York and a Proposal for a Middle Woodland Exchange. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, New York University, New York. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Sterrett, Douglas B. 1923 Mica Deposits of the United States. Bulletin 740. United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Stewart, R. Michael 1989 Trade and Exchange in Middle Atlantic Region Prehistory. Archaeology of Eastern North America 17:4774.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. Michael 1994 Rethinking the Abbott Farm: Oral Tradition, Context, and Historic Perspective. Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of New Jersey 49:6166.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. Michael 1995 The Status of Woodland Prehistory in the Middle Atlantic Region. Archaeology of Eastern North America 23:177206.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. Michael 2015 Archaeological/Ethnographic Evidence. In Cultural Affiliation of the Abbott Farm National Historic Landmark, edited by Obermeyer, Brice, Grumet, Robert, Stewart, R. Michael, Rementer, Jim, and Brown, Greg, pp. 3958. Report of NAGPRA Documentation Grant (40-12-GP-566) awarded to the Delaware Tribe of Indians. Oklahoma. Copies available from the New Jersey State Museum, Trenton.Google Scholar
Thurman, Melburn D. 1978 The “Hopewellian” Occupation of the Abbott Farm: A Demurrer. Archaeology of Eastern North America 6:7278.Google Scholar
Thomas, Ronald A. 1970 Adena Influence in the Middle Atlantic Coast. In Adena: The Seeking of an Identity, edited by Swartz, B. K., pp. 5687. Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.Google Scholar
Volk, Ernest 1911 The Archaeology of the Delaware Valley. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 5. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Ward, Devin Lea, and Lattanzi, Gregory D. 2015 Collections Mortality and Immortality: A Case Study of Aging Museum Collections through Faunal Analysis from the Pennella Site, Ocean County, New Jersey. Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology 31:5369.Google Scholar
Weslager, Clinton A. 1968 Delaware's Buried Past. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Williams, Lorraine E., and Thomas, Ronald A. 1982 The Early/Middle Woodland Period in New Jersey (ca. 1000 B.C.–A.D. 1000). In New Jersey's Archeological Resources: A Review of Research Problems and Survey Priorities: The Paleo-Indian Period to Present, edited by Chesler, Olga, pp. 103138. Office of Cultural and Environmental Services, Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Winters, Howard D. 1968 Value Systems and Trade Cycles of the Late Archaic in the Midwest. In New Perspectives in Archaeology, edited by Binford, Sally R. and Binford, Louis R., pp.175221. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Winters, Howard D. 1969 The Riverton Culture: A Second Millennium Occupation in the Central Wabash Valley. Reports of Investigations No. 13. Illinois State Museum and Illinois Archaeological Survey. State of Illinois, Springfield.Google Scholar
Winters, Howard D. 1981 Excavating in Museums: Notes on Mississippian Hoes and Middle Woodland Copper Gouges and Celts. In The Research Potential of Anthropological Collections in Museums, edited by Cantwell, Anne-Marie, Griffin, James, and Rothschild, Nan, pp. 1734. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Boulanger supplementary material

Table S1

Download Boulanger supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 122.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Boulanger supplementary material

Table S2

Download Boulanger supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 128.4 KB