Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T01:36:22.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geoarchaeology of the Midland (Paleoindian) Site, Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Vance T. Holliday
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, 550 North Park Street, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
David J. Meltzer
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275

Abstract

In 1953 human remains and a new type of Paleoindian artifact were discovered eroding from a "blowout" in a small dune field along Monahans Draw, near Midland, Texas, on the Southern High Plains. The projectile points became the type “Midland” collection. Stratigraphy, radiometric dating, paleontology, and geochemistry suggested that the artifacts and bones dated to at least 10,000 B.P. and that the human remains were possibly as old as 20,000 B.P. The researchers believed that the human bones were from below a red sand that in turn was below a Folsom occupation. The dating of the human remains has long been problematic, however, and recent attempts to apply U-series dating further confuse the story. Geoarchaeological investigations were carried out at the site from 1989 to 1992 to reevaluate the geochronology, with particular reference to the age of the skeletal material. We reach several conclusions: (1) there are two Red Sands; (2) the human remains are from below the upper Red Sand, but the Folsom material is from above the lower Red Sand and, therefore, the Red Sand stratigraphy is not relevant to the age of the human remains; (3) the human remains were associated with the valley-margin facies of a lacustrine carbonate that is well dated in the region and rarely is > 10,000 B.P.; and (4) all numerical dating methods applied at the site produced unreliable results. We find no compelling evidence that the human remains from the Midland site are older than Folsom age; they may be contemporary with or younger than the Folsom occupation.

Resumen

Resumen

En 1953 restos humanos y un nuevo tipo de artefactos paleoindios fueron descubiertos en una superficie de deflación en un pequeño campo de dunas en Monahans Draw, cerca de Midland, Texas, en los Grandes Llanos del Sur. Las puntas de proyectil se conocerían como la colección tipo “Midland.” La estratigrafía, los fechados radiométricos, la paleotología, y la geoquímica sugirieron que los artefactos y huesos se remontaron a cuanto menos 10.000 a. P. y que los restos humanos posiblemente tuvieron una antigüedad de casi 20.000 a.P. Una pieza clave de evidencia fue la interpretacion de que los restos humanos estaban localizados estratigraficamente bajo una capa de arena roja, la que a su vez se encontraba debajo de un sitio Folsom. Sin embargo, el fechado de los restos humanos ha sido problemdtico por largo tiempo; recientes intentos de emplear series de uranio (U-series) no han hecho sino complicar la historia. Investigaciones geoarqueologícas fueron llevadas a caboen el sitio entre 1989 y 1992 a fin de reevaluar la geocronología, con particular atención a la edad del material óseo. Hemos llegado a varias conclusiones: (1) existen dos Arenas Rojas; (2) los restos humanos provienen de debajo de la capa de Arena Roja superior, pero el material Folsom se halla encima de la Arena Roja inferior y, por tanto, la estratigrafia de la Arena Roja no es relevante a la edad de los restos humanos; (3) los restos humanos han sido asociados con la fades del margen del valle de un carbonato lacustre ampliamente fechado en la región y que raramente es > 10.000 a.P.; y (4) todos los métodos de fechado numérico empleados en el sitio produjeron resultados poco confiables. No hemos hallado evidencia fehaciente de que los restos del sitio de Midland antecedan a lafase Folsom; quizás sean contemporáneos con, o más recientes que, la ocupación Folsom.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Agogino, G. A. 1969 The Midland Complex: Is It valid? American Anthropologist 71: 11171118.Google Scholar
Amick, D. S. 1995 Patterns of Technological Variation Among Folsom and Midland Projectile Points in the American Southwest. Plains Anthropologist 40: 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaine, J. C. 1968 Preliminary Report of an Early Man Site in West Texas. In Transactions of the Third Regional Archaeological Symposium for Southwestern New Mexico and Western Texas, pp. 111. South Plains Archaeological Society, Lubbock, Texas.Google Scholar
Blaine, J. C. 1971 Midland Points. In Guide to Certain American Indian Projectile Points, by Bell, R. E., pp. 6263. Special Bulletin No. 4. Oklahoma Anthropological Society, Oklahoma City.Google Scholar
Blaine, J. C. 1991 The Folsom-Midland Controversy. In Transactions of the Twentyseventh Regional Archaeological Symposium for Southeastern New Mexico and Western Texas, p. 1, edited by P. Brothers. Midland Archaeological Society, Midland, Texas. Google Scholar
Broecker, W S., and Kulp, J. L. 1957 Lamont Natural Radiocarbon Measurements IV Science 126: 13241334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cotter, J. L. 1991 Update on Natchez Man. American Antiquity 56: 3639.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R. 1956 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates I. Science 124: 664672.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C, Haynes, C. V, Jr., and Larson, M. L. 1996 Discussion and Conclusions. In The Mill Iron Site, edited by Frison, G. C., pp. 205216. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Green, F. E. 1961 The Monahans Dune Area. In Paleoecology of the Llano Estacado, assembled by Wendorf, F., pp. 227. Publication No. 1, Fort Burgwin Research Center. Museum of New Mexico, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Haynes C., V, Jr. 1993 Clovis-Folsom Geochronology and Climatic Change. In From Kostenki to Clovis: Upper Paleolithic-Paleo- Indian Adaptations, edited by Soffer, O. and Praslov, N.D. pp. 219236. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofman, J. L. 1992 Recognition and Interpretation of Folsom Technological Variability on the Southern High Plains. In Ice Age Hunters of the Rockies, edited by Stanford, D. J. and Day, J.S. pp. 193224. Denver Museum of Natural History and University Press of Colorado, Denver.Google Scholar
Hofman, J. L., Amick, D. S., and Rose, R. O. 1990 Shifting Sands: A Folsom-Midland Assemblage from a Campsite in Western Texas. Plains Anthropologist 35: 221253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, V T. 1985 Archaeological Geology of the Lubbock Lake Site, Southern High Plains of Texas. Geological Society of America Bulletin 96: 14831492.Google Scholar
Holliday, V T. 1989a The Blackwater Draw Formation (Quaternary): A l.4-plus m.y. Record of Eolian Sedimentation and Soil Formation on the Southern High Plains. Geological Society of America Bulletin 101: 15981607.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, V T. 1989b Middle Holocene Drought on the Southern High Plains. Quaternary Research 31: 7482.Google Scholar
Holliday, V T. 1995a Stratigraphy and Paleoenvironments of Late Quaternary Valley Fills on the Southern High Plains. Memoir No. 186. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Holliday, V T. 1995b Late Quaternary Stratigraphy of the Southern High Plains. In Ancient Peoples and Landscapes, edited by Johnson, E., pp. 289313. Museum of Texas Tech University, Lubbock.Google Scholar
Irwin, H. T. 1971 Developments in Early Man Studies in Western North America, 1960-1970. Arctic Anthropology 8: 4267.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. D. 1983 Origins. In Ancient North Americans, edited by Jennings, J. D., pp. 2567. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. D. 1989 Prehistory of North America. 3rd ed. Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View, California.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. 1987 Vertebrate Remains. In Lubbock Lake: Late Quaternary Studies on the Southern High Plains, edited by Johnson, E., pp. 4989. Texas A & M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
Judge, W. J. 1970 Systems Analysis and the Folsom-Midland Question. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 26: 4051.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. H. 1964 Comments on the Archaeology of the Llano Estacado. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society 35: 118.Google Scholar
Krieger, A. D. 1964 Early Man in the New World. In Prehistoric Man in the New World, edited by Jennings, J. D. and Norbeck, E., pp. 2381. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
McKinney, C. R. 1992 Midland Woman: The Oldest American. G.S.A. Abstracts with Programs, vol. 24, p. A26. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Olson, E. A., and Broecker, W S. 1959 Lamont Natural Radiocarbon Measurements V. American Journal of Science Radiocarbon Supplement 1: 128.Google Scholar
Rosholt, J. N. 1958 Radioactive Disequilibrium Studies as an Aid in Understanding the Natural Migration of Uranium and Its Decay Products. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy 2: 230236. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Schwarcz, H. P., and Blackwell, B. A. 1992 Archaeological Applications. In Uranium-series Disequilibrium: Applications to Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences, 2nd ed., edited by Ivanovich, M. and Harmon, R.S. pp. 513552. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sellards, E. H. 1952 Early Man in America. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Sellards, E. H. 1955 Further Investigations at the Scharbauer Site. In The Midland Discovery, by Wendorf, F., Krieger, A. D., Albritton, C. C., Jr., and Stewart, T. D., pp. 126132. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
M. J., Singer, and Janitzky, P. (editors) 1986 Field and Laboratory Procedures Used in a Soil Chronosequence Study. Bulletin No. 1648. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Smith, F. H. 1976 The Skeletal Remains of the Earliest Americans: A Survey. Tennessee Anthropologist 1: 116147.Google Scholar
Steele, D. G., and Powell, J. F. 1992 Peopling of the Americas: Paleobiological Evidence. Human Biology 64: 303336.Google Scholar
Stewart, T. D. 1955 Description of the Human Skeletal Remains. In The Midland Discovery, by Wendorf, F., Krieger, A. D., Albritton, C. C., Jr., and Stewart, T. D., pp. 7790. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., and Reimer, P. J. 1993 Extended 14C Data Base and Revised CALIB 3.0 l4C Age Calibration Program. Radiocarbon 35: 215230.Google Scholar
Szabo, B. J. 1980 Results and Assessments of Uranium Series Dating of Vertebrate Fossils from Quaternary Alluviums in Colorado. Arctic and Alpine Research 12: 95100.Google Scholar
Turner, C. G. III 1992 New World Origins: New Research from the Americas and the Soviet Union. In Ice Age Hunters of the Rockies, edited by Stanford, D. J. and Day, J.S. pp. 750. Denver Museum of Natural History and University Press of Colorado, Denver.Google Scholar
Wendorf, F. 1975 Summary and Conclusions. In Late Pleistocene Environments of the Southern High Plains, edited by Wendorf, F. and Hester, J.J. pp. 257278. Publication No. 9. Fort Burgwin Research Center, Taos, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Wendorf, F. 1961 Paleoecology of the Llano Estacado. Publication No. 1, Fort Burgwin Research Center. Museum of New Mexico Press, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Wendorf, F, and Hester, J. J. (editors) 1975 Late Pleistocene Environments of the Southern High Plains. Publication No. 9. Fort Burgwin Research Center, Taos, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Wendorf, F., and Krieger, A. D. 1959 New Light on the Midland Discovery. American Antiquity 25: 6678.Google Scholar
Wendorf, E, Krieger, A. D., Albritton, C. C., Jr., and Steward, T. D. 1955 The Midland Discovery. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R. 1966 An Introduction to American Archaeology: North and Middle America, vol. 1. Prentice-Hall, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Wormington, H. M. 1957 Ancient Man in North America. 4th ed. Popular Series No. 4. Denver Museum of Natural History, Denver.Google Scholar