Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T18:45:22.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Archaic of the Lower Mississippi Valley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William G. Haag
William G. Haag*
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

No archaeological remains which the majority of specialists will accept as Archaic have been found in the Mississippi Valley from the mouth of Ohio River to the Gulf of Mexico. Despite this, the literature reflects a general acceptance of the belief that the Archaic stage is well represented in the Lower Valley. The presence of concentrated Archaic populations in northern Alabama and western Tennessee and Kentucky has given comparative support to these expectations and has provided part of the source for some of the hypothetical statements in the literature of what the Lower Valley Archaic ought to be like. Although the failure of writers to agree on a definition of Archaic which will satisfy the evidence in all of the areas of Eastern United States has contributed to the problem of identifying Archaic materials in the Lower Valley, the lack of these remains can best be explained by the geology of the region. The cutting and filling of the Alluvial Valley during the Pleistocene changes in sea level have removed or buried all of the surfaces that might have been occupied by Archaic peoples. The surface of the Alluvial Valley is everywhere less than 5000 years old. Possible Late Archaic sites are located on old stable beach ridges or near enough to the Pleistocene terraces not to have been included in the general pattern of Recent coastal subsidence. It is concluded that Archaic or earlier materials are absent in the Lower Alluvial Valley of the Mississippi River. Neither Tchefuncte nor Copell are accepted as Archaic; Poverty Point is viewed as transitional from an Upper Archaic tradition to some phase of the Formative stage. Poverty Point materials may not be expected to be found in quantity along the Gulf Coast of the Mississippi Delta region.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 26 , Issue 3Part1 , January 1961 , pp. 317 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Byers, D. S. 1959. An Introduction to Five Papers on the Archaic Stage. American Antiquity, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 229–32. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. R. 1958. Trend and Tradition in the Prehistory of the Eastern United States. Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association, No. 88. Menasha.Google Scholar
Collins, H. B. 1927. Archeological Work in Louisiana and Mississippi. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 78, No. 7, pp. 200–7. Washington.Google Scholar
Fisk, H. N. 1944. Geological Investigations of the Alluvial Valley of the Lower Mississippi River. War Department, Corps of Engineers, V. S. Army, Mississippi River Commision Publication No. 52. Vicksburg.Google Scholar
Fisk, H. N. and McFarlan, E. Jr. 1955. Late Quaternary Deltaic Deposits of the Mississippi River. In “The Crust of the Earth,” Geological Society of America Special Paper No. 62, pp. 279–302. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A. and Quimby, G. I. Jr. 1945. The Tchefuncte Culture, an Early Occupation of the Lower Mississippi Valley. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 2. Menasha.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A. and Webb, C. H. 1956. Poverty Point, A Late Archaic Site in Louisiana. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 46, Part 1. New York.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A., Phillips, Philip, and Haag, W. G. 1955. The Jaketown Site in West-Central Mississippi. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 45, Part 1. New York.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B. 1952.a Culture Periods in Eastern United States Archeology. In Archeology of Eastern United States, edited by Griffin, J. B., pp. 352–64. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B. 1952.b Prehistoric Cultures of the Central Mississippi Valley. In Archeology of Eastern United States, edited by Griffin, J. B., pp. 226–38. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B. 1959. Review of “Trend and Tradition in the Prehistory of the Eastern United States,” by Caldwell, Joseph R.. American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 63, pp. 414–6. Princeton.Google Scholar
Haag, W. G. 1942. Early Horizons in the Southeast. American Antiquity, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 209–22. Menasha.Google Scholar
Haag, W. G. 1955. A Prehistory of Mississippi. Journal of Mississippi History, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 81–109. Jackson.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. D. 1952. Prehistory of the Lower Mississippi Valley. In Archeology of Eastern United States, edited by Griffin, J. B., pp. 256–71. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. Charles 1959. The Desert Cultures and the Balcones Phase: Archaic Manifestations in the Southwest and Texas. American Antiquity, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 276–88. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Leblanc, J. R. and Bernard, H. A. 1954. Résumé of Late Recent Geological History of the Gulf Coast. Geologie en Mijnbouw, n.s., Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 185–94. The Hague.Google Scholar
Lewis, T.M.N., and Kneberg, Madeline 1959. The Archaic Culture in the Middle South. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 161–83. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1958. Preliminary Archaeological Investigations in the Sierra de Tamaulipas, Mexico. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., Vol. 48, Part 6. Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntire, W. G. 1958. Prehistoric Indian Settlements of the Changing Mississippi River Delta. Louisiana State University Studies, Coastal Study Series No. 1. Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Miller, C. F. 1950. Early Cultural Horizons in the Southeastern United States. American Antiquity, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 273–88. Menasha.Google Scholar
Phillips, Philip 1953. Review of “Prehistory of the Lower Mississippi Valley” by Jennings, Jesse D., and “Prehistoric Cultures of the Central Mississippi Valley,” by Griffin, James B.. American Antiquity, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 182–4. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Phillips, Philip, Ford, J. A., and Griffin, J. B. 1951. Archaeological Survey in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, 1940–1947. Papers of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 25. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Russell, R. J. 1940. Quaternary History of Louisiana. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, Vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 1199–234. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Russell, R. J. 1957. The Instability of Sea Level. American Scientist, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 414–30. Easton.Google Scholar
Sears, W. H. 1948. What Is the Archaic? American Antiquity, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 122–4. Menasha.Google Scholar
Soday, Frank 1954. The Quad Site, A Paleo-Indian Village in Northern Alabama. Tennessee Archaeologist, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1–20. Knoxville.Google Scholar
Webb, C. H. 1948. Evidence of Pre-Pottery Cultures in Louisiana. American Antiquity, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 227–32. Menasha.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R., and Phillips, Philip 1958. Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Williams, Stephen 1957. The Island 35 Mastodon: Its Bearings on the Age of Archaic Cultures in the East. American Antiquity, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 359–72. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar