Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:24:28.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Animal Bones from Caves to Cities: Reverse Utility Curves as Methodological Artifacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Curtis W. Marean  and
Carol J. Frey
Curtis W. Marean
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364
Carol J. Frey
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Utility-based studies are attractive to zooarchaeologists because they afford the opportunity of investigating economic decisions relative to particular contexts. While a positive relationship between utility and skeletal element abundance is anticipated at residential sites, a reverse utility curve is most common. A popular mechanistic explanation argues that reverse utility curves result from density-mediated destruction of bone, suggesting that utility-based studies will rarely be successful as density-mediated destruction will overwhelm any skeletal element patterning created by differential transport. We show with archaeological and experimental/naturalistic taphonomic data that the mechanistic explanation is overstated. Fauna from Kobeh cave (a Mousterian site) and "Ain Dara (an Iron Age site) both show a reverse utility pattern when estimates of long bone abundance are based just on ends (the procedure followed at all sites that have shown a reverse utility pattern), and all bones are plotted together. When long bone abundance is estimated from the middle shaft portion, the reverse utility pattern collapses and a positive relationship arises. The ubiquity of the reverse utility curve derives in many cases from basing long bone abundance estimates on ends and scatter-plotting the abundance of long bones with non-long bones, thus restricting the analysis to the least dense most spongy bone portions. Long bone abundance estimates must include the middle shaft portion to attain accurate estimates of element abundance. Long bone abundance, when based on shaft portions, can be usefully compared to utility to investigate utility-based models of human behavior.

Los estudios zooarqueológicos basados en la utilidad de los elementos óseos brindan la oportunidad de investigar decisions económicas en contextes particulares. Aunque usualmente se anticipa una relatión positiva entre utilidad y abundancia de elementos óseos en sitios residenciales, la curva de utilidad negativa es más común. Una explication mecanistica popular sostiene que tal curva es el producto de destruction diferencial de huesos determinada por densidad más no por transporte; por lo tanto, los estudios de utilidad son raramente exitosos. Utilizando datas arqueológicos y experimentales/naturísticos tafonómicos demostramos que la explicatión mecanística es exagerada. La fauna de la cueva Kobeh (un sito musteriense) y de 'Ain Dara (un sitio de la Edad de Hierro) revela un patrón de utilidad negative cuando los cálcules de abundancia de huesos largos se basan solamente en los extremes de los huesos y vice versa. Por lo tanto, el cálculo de la abundancia de huesos largos debe incluir la portion media del hueso para obtener una aproximación acertada de abundancia de elementos. De esta manera se pueden obtener comparaciones productivas entre utliidad y abundancia para investigar modelos de conducta humana basados en utliidad.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , October 1997 , pp. 698 - 711
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bartram, L. E. M. 1993 An Ethnoarchaeological Analysis of Kua San (Botswana) Bone Food Refuse. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Bartram, L. E., Kroll, E. M., and Bunn, H. T. 1991 Variability in Camp Structure and Bone Food Refuse Patterning at Kua San Hunter-Gatherer Camps. In The Interpretation of Archaeological Spatial Patterning, edited by Kroll, E. M. and Douglas, T., pp. 77–148. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1978 Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1981 Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1984 The Faunal Remains from Klasies River Mouth. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1985 Human Ancestors: Changing Views of Their Behavior. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4: 292–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1991 Review of The Human Revolution, by P. Mellars and C. Stringer (editors). Journal of Field Archaeology 18: 111–115.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R., and Bertram, J. B. 1977 Bone Frequencies and Attritional Processes. In For Theory Building in Archaeology, edited by Binford, L. R., pp. 77–153. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Blumenschine, R. J. 1986 Carcass Consumption Sequences and the Archaeological Distinction of Scavenging and Hunting. Journal of Human Evolution 15: 639–659.Google Scholar
Blumenschine, R. J. 1988 An Experimental Model of the Timing of Hominid and Carnivore Influence on Archaeological Bone Assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science 15: 483–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenschine, R. J., and Caro, T. 1986 Unit Flesh Weights of Some East African Bovids. African Journal of Ecology 24: 273–286.Google Scholar
Brain, C. K. 1981 The Hunters or the Hunted. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Brink, J., and Dawe, B. 1989 Final Report of the 1985 and 1986 Field Season at Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump, Alberta. Manuscript Series No. 16. Archaeological Survey of Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
Bunn, H. T. Bartram, L. E., and Kroll, E. M. 1988 Variability in Bone Assemblage Formation from Hadza Hunting, Scavenging, and Carcass Processing. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 7: 412–457.Google Scholar
Capaldo, S. D. 1995 Inferring Hominid and Carnivore Behavior from Dual- Patterned Archaeofaunal Assemblages. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Chase, P. G. 1986 The Hunters of Combe Grenal: Approaches to Middle Paleolithic Subsistence in Europe. BAR International Series 286. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Chase, P. G. 1988 Scavenging and Hunting in the Middle Paleolithic. In Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, edited by Dibble, H. L. and Montet, A.-White, pp. 225–232. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Chase, P. G., Armand, D., Debenath, A., Dibble, H., 1994 Taphonomy and Zooarchaeology of a Mousterian Faunal Assemblage from La Quina, Charente, France. Journal of Field Archaeology 21: 289–305.Google Scholar
Emerson, A. M. 1990 Archaeological Implications of Variability in the Economic Anatomy of Bison bison. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Ewer, R. F. 1973 The Carnivores. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Grayson, D. K. 1988 Danger Cave, Last Supper Cave, and Hanging Rock Shelter: The Faunas. Anthropological Papers No. 66. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Grayson, D. K. 1989 Bone Transport, Bone Destruction, and Reverse Utility Curves. Journal of Archaeological Science 16: 643–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J. 1993 The Impacts of Domestic Dogs on Bone in Forager Camps; or, The Dog-Gone Bones. In From Bones to Behavior, edited by Hudson, J., pp. 301–323. Occasional Paper No. 21. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Carbondale, Illinois.Google Scholar
Kent, S. 1993 Variability in Faunal Assemblages: The Influence of Hunting Skill, Sharing, Dogs, and Mode of Cooking on Faunal Remains at a Sedentary Kalahari Community. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 12: 323–385.Google Scholar
Klein, R. G. 1989 Why Does Skeletal Element Abundance Differ between Smaller and Larger Bovids at Klasies River Mouth and Other Archaeological Sites? Journal of Archaeological Science 16: 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupo, K. D. 1995 Hadza Bone Assemblages and Hyena Attrition: An Ethnographic Example of the Influence of Cooking and Mode of Discard on the Intensity of Scavenger Ravaging. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 14: 288–314.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L. 1984 Bone Density and Differential Survivorship of Fossil Classes. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 3: 259–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R. L. 1985 Bone Frequencies: Differential Transport, In Situ Destruction, and the MGUI. Journal of Archaeological Science 12: 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R. L. 1992 Anatomical considerations of utility curves in zooarchaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 19: 7–22.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L. 1993 Density-Mediated Attrition of Bone Assemblages: New Insights. In From Bones to Behavior, edited by Hudson, J., pp. 324–341. Occasional Paper No. 21. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L. 1994 Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L., Houghton, L. E., and Chambers, A. L. 1992 The Effect of Structural Density on Marmot Skeletal Part Representation in Archaeological Sites. Journal of Archaeological Science 19: 557–573.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L., Savelle, J. M., and Whitridge, P. 1992 Derivation and Application of a Food Utility Index for Phocid Seals. Journal of Archaeological Science 19: 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marean, C. W. 1991 Measuring the Postdepositional Destruction of Bone in Archaeological Assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science 18: 677–694.Google Scholar
Marean, C. W., and Bertino, L. 1994 Intrasite Spatial Analysis of Bone: Subtracting the Effect of Secondary Carnivore Consumers. American Antiquity 59: 748–768.Google Scholar
Marean, C. W., and Kim, S. Y. 1998 Mousterian Faunal Remains from Kobeh Cave: Behavioral Implications for Neanderthals and Early Modern Humans. Current Anthropology, in press.Google Scholar
Marean, C. W., and Spencer, L. M. 1991 Impact of Carnivore Ravaging on Zooarchaeological Measures of Element Abundance. American Antiquity 56: 645–658.Google Scholar
Marean, C. W., Spencer, L. M., Blumenschine, R. J., 1992 Captive Hyena Bone Choice and Destruction, the Schlepp Effect, and Olduvai Archaeofaunas. Journal of Archaeological Science 19: 101–121.Google Scholar
Mellars, P. 1996 The Neanderthal Legacy: An Archaeological Perspective from Western Europe. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Mercier, N., Valladas, H., Valladas, G., Reyss, J.-L., Jelinek, A., 1995 TL Dates of Burnt Flints from Jelinek's Excavations at Tabun and Their Implications. Journal of Archaeological Science 22: 495–509.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, D., and Jones, K. T. 1988 A Reconsideration of Animal Body-Part Utility Indices. American Antiquity 53: 486–504.Google Scholar
O'Connell, J. F. 1995 Ethnoarchaeology Needs a General Theory of Behavior. Journal of Archaeological Research 3: 205–255.Google Scholar
O'Connell, J. F, and Hawkes, K. 1988 Hadza Hunting, Butchering, and Bone Transport and Their Archaeological Implications. Journal of Anthropological Research 44: 113–161.Google Scholar
O'Connell, J. F., Hawkes, K., and Blurton-Jones, N. 1989 Reanalysis of Large Mammal Body Part Transport among the Hadza. Journal of Archaeological Science 17: 301–316.Google Scholar
Richardson, P. R. K. 1980 Carnivore Damage to Antelope Bones and Its Archaeological Implications. Paleontologia Africana 23: 109–125.Google Scholar
Savelle, J. M., and Friesen, T. M. 1996 An Odontocete (Cetacea) Meat Utility Index. Journal of Archaeological Science 23: 713–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelle, J. M., Friesen, T. M., and Lyman, R. L. 1996 Derivation and Application of an Otariid Utility Index. Journal of Archaeological Science 23: 705–712.Google Scholar
Speth, J. D. 1983 Bison Kills and Bone Counts. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Stone, E. C, and Zimansky, P. 1997 Investigations on the Lower Mound at “Ain Dara 1992-1984. Annates Archeologigues Arabes Syriennes (Damascus, Syria), in press. Manuscript 1996.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. H., and Mayer, D. 1983 Behavioral Faunal Analysis of Selected Horizons. In The Archaeology of Monitor Valley 2: Gatecliff Shelter, edited by Thomas, D. H., pp. 353–391. Anthropological Papers No. 59. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar