Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T18:56:40.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Alternative Explanation of Subsistence Change during the Early Historic Period at Pecos Pueblo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Daniel T. Reff
Daniel T. Reff*
Affiliation:
Division of Comparative Studies, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a recent article, Spielmann et al. (1990) cited Spanish abuse of Indian labor and food stores as a major cause of dietary change at Pecos Pueblo. Of equal or greater significance were Old World diseases, which reduced the population of Pecos and other Pueblos and which necessarily impacted subsistence strategies.

Resumen

Resumen

En un trabajo reciente, Spielmann et al. (1990) citaron la explotación de los indígenas y de sus comestibles como causa principal de cambio dietético en el pueblo de Pecos. De igual o mayor importancia fueron las enfermedades introducidas desde el Viejo Mundo, las cuales habían reducido la población de Pecos y de los otros pueblos, y necesariamente cambiaron las estrategias de subsistencia.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , July 1993 , pp. 563 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Brown, I. W. 1989 The Calumet Ceremony in the Southeast and Its Archaeological Manifestations. American Antiquity 54: 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundersen, J. N. 1987 Wisconsin Pipestone: A Preliminary Mineralogical Examination. The Wisconsin Archeologist 68: 1–21.Google Scholar
Gundersen, J. N. 1988 Pipestones of the St. Helena Phase. In The St. Helena Phase: New Data, Fresh Interpretations, edited by Blakeslee, D. J., pp. 79–97. J and L Reprint, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Gundersen, J. N. 1991 The Mineralogical Characterization of Catlinite from Its Sole Provenance, Pipestone National Monument, Minnesota. Research/Resources Management Report No. MWR-17. National Park Service, Omaha.Google Scholar
Gundersen, J. N., and Tiffany, J. A. 1986 Nature and Provenance of Red Pipestone from the Wittrock Site (130B4), Northwest Iowa. North American Archaeologist 7: 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, A. H. 1977 Catlinite Calumets: Artifactual Clues to Late Prehistoric and Historic Interactions in Eastern North America. Unpublished B. A. Honors thesis, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Sigstad, J. S. 1973 Age and Distribution of Catlinite and Red Pipestone: 1966. Manuscript on file, National Park Service, Midwest Region, Omaha.Google Scholar