Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T22:48:02.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Additional Data from the Dodd and Phillips Ranch Sites, South Dakota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

George Metcalf*
Affiliation:
United States National Museum, Washington, D.C.

Extract

All the archaeological specimens from the Dodd (39ST30) and Phillips Ranch (39ST14) sites, Oahe Reservoir, South Dakota, were transferred recently by the River Basin Surveys, Bureau of American Ethnology, to the United States National Museum for accessioning into the permanent study collection of the Division of Archeology. During the processing of the material it was necessary to handle each object, to check its field number with the catalogs, the feature sheets, and the published reports, and to prepare brief descriptions, measurements, and observations for the permanent catalog of the United States National Museum. While handling the specimens certain discrepancies between the artifacts actually present and those described in the published report (Lehmer 1954 [see review in this issue]) were discovered. These mistakes included the omission of individual objects as well as of several groups of distinctive artifacts, and erroneous descriptions and identifications.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hurt, W. R. 1951 Report of the Investigation of the Swanson Site, 39BR16, Brule County, South Dakota, 1950. South Dakota Archaeological Commission, Archaeological Studies, Circular No. 3. Pierre.Google Scholar
Hurt, W. R. 1953 Report of the Investigation cf the Thomas Riggs Site, 39HU1, Hughes County, South Dakota, 1952. South Dakota Archaeological Commission, Archaeological Studies, Circular No. 5. Pierre.Google Scholar
Lehmer, D. J. 1954 Archeological Investigations in the Oahe Dam Area, South Dakota, 1950–51. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 158. Washington.Google Scholar
Mills, W. C. 1922 Certain Mounds and Village Sites in Ohio, Vol. 3. Columbus.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. G. 1952 Outline of Cultures in the Ohio Region. In Archeology of Eastern United States, edited by Griffin, J. B.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, W. A. 1944 The Pre-Iroquoian Occupations of New York State. Memoirs of the Rochester Museum of Arts and Sciences, No. 1.Google Scholar
Strong, W. D. 1940 From History to Prehistory in the Northern Great Plains. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 100. Washington.Google Scholar
Swanton, J. R. 1942 Source Material on the History and Ethnology of the Caddo Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 132. Washington.Google Scholar
Tyzzer, E. E. 1943 Animal Tooth Implements from Shell Heaps of Maine. American Antiquity, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 354–60. Menasha.Google Scholar
Wedel, W. R. 1955 Archeological Materials from the Vicinity of Morbridge, South Dakota. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 157. Washington.Google Scholar
Will, G. F. and Spinden, H. J. 1906 The Mandans: A Study of Their Culture, Archaeology, and Language. Papers of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 3, No. 4. CambridgeGoogle Scholar