Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T11:50:57.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Proposed Terminology for Shape Classifications of Artifacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Extract

It is a very bold individual indeed who will suggest ideas concerning descriptive methods pointing toward a system for the simplification of classifications for archaeological artifacts. The chief difficulty in the way of arriving at simplified classifications lies in the great diversity of irregular forms. Consequently, the problem becomes so intricate, so full of pitfalls, that one is apt to become lost in a maze of detail out of which there is but slight possiblity of gathering together and properly grouping the essentials.

Whether the subject be axes, celts, gorgets, projectile points or any one of the many groups of artifacts, we must recognize at the very start that there are certain forms which almost defy description.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

121 After these figures were written, we discovered that the word “Folsomoid” had been used by Frank H. H. Roberts, Jr.: A Folsom Complex, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 94, No. 4, p. 7, 1935.