Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:49:09.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Spatial Information to Reduce Costs of Controlling Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

C.L. Carpentier ,
D.J. Bosch  and
S.S. Batie
C.L. Carpentier
Affiliation:
Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute
D.J. Bosch
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
S.S. Batie
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University
Get access

Abstract

Reducing costs of controlling nonpoint source (NPS) pollution will be a high public priority in the next century. Compliance and transaction costs of reducing nitrogen runoff from dairies in the Lower Susquehanna Watershed by 40% are estimated for perfectly targeted and uniform performance standards. The perfectly targeted standard reduces compliance and transaction costs by almost 75% compared with the uniform standard. Future NPS control policies should use spatial information to target policy resources to priority concerns, areas, and farms. Further research is needed to lower the costs and increase the accuracy of spatial information.

Type
Economics and the Environment in the 21st Century
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , April 1998 , pp. 72 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batie, S.S., and Arcenas, A. 1997. “Farmer-Led Environmental Management: Applying Lessons from Business-Led Environmental Management.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.Google Scholar
Batie, S.S., and Ervin, D.E. 1997. “Flexible Incentives for Environmental Management: A Typology.” Paper presented at conference, Flexible Incentives for Adoption of Environmental Technologies in Agriculture, June 8-9, Gainesville, Fla.Google Scholar
Bohm, P., and Russell, C.S. 1985. “Comparative Analysis of Alternative Policy Instruments.” In Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, ed. Kneese, A.V. and Sweeney, J.L. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bosch, D.J., Carpentier, C.L., and Heimlich, R. 1995. “A Farm Model for Evaluating Nonpoint Source Pollution Abatement Programs.” SP-94-03, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. February.Google Scholar
Brooke, A., Kendrick, D., and Meeraus, A. 1992. GAMS: A User's Guide, Release 2.25. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Camacho, R. 1992. “Chesapeake Bay Program Nutrient Reduction Strategy Reevaluation Report No. 8: Financial Cost Effectiveness of Point and Nonpoint Source Nutrient Reduction Technologies in the Chesapeake Bay Basin.” ICPRB Report no. 94-4. Washington D.C.: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. December.Google Scholar
Carpentier, C.L. 1996. “Value of Information for Targeting Agro-pollution Control: A Case Study of the Lower Susquehanna Watershed.” Ph.D. diss. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
Chesapeake Bay Program. 1994. Trends in Phosphorus, Nitrogen, Secchi Depth, and Dissolved Oxygen in Chesapeake Bay, 1984 to 1992. CBP/TRS 115/94. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. August.Google Scholar
Chesapeake Bay Program. 1996. State of the Chesapeake Bay, 1995. Annapolis, Md.: Chesapeake Bay Program Office.Google Scholar
Covington, W.W., Wood, D.B., Young, D.L., Dykstra, D.P., and Garrett, L.D. 1988. “TEAMS: A Decision Support System for Multiresource Management.” Journal of Forestry 86: 25–33.Google Scholar
DeCoursey, D.G. 1985. “Mathematical Models for Nonpoint Water Pollution Control” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 40: 508–13.Google Scholar
Ford, S.A. 1992. “1991 Pennsylvania Dairy Farm Business Analysis.” Extension Circular. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, Cooperative Extension.Google Scholar
Heatwole, C.D., Shanholtz, V.O., Yagow, E.R., and Collins, E.R. Jr. 1987. “Targeting Animal Waste Pollution with Virginia GIS.” Paper no. 87-4049. Saint Joseph, Mich.: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.Google Scholar
Krier, J.E., and Montgomery, W.D. 1973. “Resource Allocation, Information Cost and the Form of Government Interventions.” Natural Resources Journal 13: 89–105.Google Scholar
Lee, W.F., Boehlje, M.D., Nelson, A.G., and Murry, W.G. 1980. Agricultural Finance. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Malik, A.S., Larson, B.A., and Ribaudo, M. 1994. “Economic Incentives for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Control.” Water Resources Bulletin 30: 471–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (NRC), Board on Agriculture. 1993. Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda for Agriculture. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Negahban, B., Moss, C.B., Jones, J.W., Zhang, J., Boggess, W.D., and Campbell, K.L. 1994. “Optimal Field Management for Regional Water Quality Planning.” ASAE Paper no. 94-3553. Presented at the International Winter Meeting sponsored by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich.Google Scholar
Norris, P.E., and Shabman, L.A. 1992. “Economic and Environmental Considerations for Nitrogen Management in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7: 148–56.Google Scholar
Novotny, V., and Chesters, G. 1981. Handbook of Nonpoint Source Pollution Sources and Management. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Environmental Engineering Series.Google Scholar
Pennsylvania Cooperative Extension Service. 1992. “Pennsylvania State Farm Enterprise Budgets.” Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology. University Park: Pennsylvania State University. April.Google Scholar
Rader, D.N. 1994. “Nutrient Trading as a Management Option: The Tar-Pamlico Experiment.” In Economic Issues Associated with Nutrient Management Policy: Proceedings of a Regional Workshop, ed. Norris, P.E. and Danielson, L.E. Sponsored by Southern Regional Information Exchange Group-10. SRIEG-10 no. 32; SRDC Publication no. 180. Mississippi State: Mississippi State University. March.Google Scholar
Ritter, W.F. 1990. Manual for Economic and Pollution Evaluation of Livestock Manure Management Systems. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Bureau of Soil and Water. March.Google Scholar
Serotkin, N., (ed.) 1993. Penn State Agronomy Guide. University Park: Penn State Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
Shanholtz, V.O., and Zhang, N. 1988. Supplementary Information of Virginia Geographic Information System. Special Report, VirGIS 88-21. Blacksburg: VirGIS Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
Thomann, R.V., Collier, J.R., Butt, A., Casman, E., and Linker, L.C. 1994. Response of the Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Model to Loading Scenarios. CBP/TRS 101/94. Modeling Subcommittee of the Chesapeake Bay Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. April.Google Scholar
Tietenberg, T.H. 1998. Environmental Economics and Policy. 2d ed. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1995. Targeting Environmental Priorities in Agriculture: Reforming Program Strategies. OTA-ENV-640. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. September.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA); Economic Research Service (ERS). 1994. Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators. Agricultural Handbook 705. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. December.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA); Economic Research Service (ERS). 1996. “Agricultural Outlook Supplement.” Washington, D.C. April.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1991. Pennsylvania Technical Guide. Harrisburg Penna.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil Conservation Service (SCS). n.d. National Resources Inventory Database. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992. Incentive Analysis for Clean Water Act Reauthorization: Point Source/Nonpoint Source Trading for Nutrient Discharge Reductions. Washington, D.C.: Office of Water and Policy, Planning, and Evaluation.Google Scholar
Virginia Chesapeake Bay Program. 1993. Virginia's Tributary Strategies. Richmond: Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. April.Google Scholar
Williams, J.R., Jones, C.A., Kiniry, J.R., and Spanel, D.A. 1989. “The EPIC Crop Growth Model.” Transactions of the ASAE 32: 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wischmeier, W.H., and Smith, D.D. 1978. Predicting Rainfall Losses—A Guide to Conservation Planning. Agriculture Handbook no. 537. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Yagow, E.R., Shanholtz, V.O., Kleene, J.W., Mostaghimi, S., and Flagg, J.M. 1990. “Annual Estimation of Nitrogen in Agricultural Runoff.” ASAE Paper no. 90-2054. St. Joseph, Michigan: American Society of Agriculture Engineers.Google Scholar