Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T13:18:09.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A PAM Analysis of Livestock Policies in Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Allan N. Rae  and
Faisal Kasryno
Allan N. Rae
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Business, Massey University, New Zealand
Faisal Kasryno
Affiliation:
Bureau of Planning, Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture
Get access

Abstract

With the rapid increase in consumption of some livestock products in Indonesia, expansion of domestic production of these commodities may enhance smallholders' incomes, increase rural employment and add to the country's trade balance. Policy analysis matrices (PAMs) were constructed to estimate divergences between private and social costs and returns in poultry and pig production in selected regions of Indonesia. In each case, producers' use of capital was subsidised but feed input private costs exceeded social values, and output prices received by producers fell short of values based on world prices. Production of all products as import substitutes was socially profitable, but in many instances private returns to farmers were negative. Product price and feed cost divergences were the major policy-induced distortions. Reform of these policies was estimated in a static partial equilibrium framework to lead to supply expansions of each livestock product, a contraction in livestock product consumption, and therefore additional net foreign exchange earnings from the poultry and pig sectors of around $320 million.

Type
Trade Liberalization and International Agricultural Development
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , April 1993 , pp. 59 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bouis, Howarth E. (1991), “Rice in Asia: Is it Becoming a Commercial Good? Comment”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 522–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organisation (1986), The FAO World Food Model: Model Specification, ESC/M/86/M, Rome.Google Scholar
Gardner, Bruce L. (1987), The Economics of Agricultural Policies, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Gittinger, J.P. (1982), Economic Analysis of Agricultural Projects (2nd ed.), Johns Hopkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Huang, Sophia Wu and Coyle, William T. (1990), “Structural Change in East Asian Agriculture”, in Rae, A.N. and Chadee, D.D. (eds), Policies for Agricultural Trade Liberalisation and Adjustment in the Pacific Rim, Centre for Agricultural Policy Studies, Massey University, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture (1991), Statistical Book on Livestock 1991, Directorate-General of Livestock Services, Jakarta, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Ito, S., Peterson, E.W.F. and Grant, W.R. (1991), “Rice in Asia: Is it Becoming an Inferior Good? Reply”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 528–532.Google Scholar
Kasryno, F., Simatupang, P., Rusastra, I. W., Djatiharti, A. and Irawan, B. (1989), Government Incentives and Comparative Advantage in the Livestock and Feedstuff Subsectors in Indonesia, Centre for Agro Economic Research, Bogor, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Kasryno, F. and Suryana, A. (1990), “Economic Liberalisation and Agricultural Policy Adjustment in Indonesia”, Ch. 8 in Chadee, D.D. and A.N. Rae, Toward Freer Trade: Strategies and Experiences in Pacific Agricultural Reform, Massey University, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O. (1992), The Political Economy of Agricultural Pricing Policy Volume 5 (A Synthesis of the Political Economy in Developing Countries), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O., Schiff, Maurice and Valdes, Alberto (1991), The Political Economy of Agricultural Pricing Policy, Volume 1 (Latin America), Volume 2 (Asia), Volume 3 (Africa and the Mediterranean), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Monke, E. and Pearson, S.R. (1989), The Policy Analysis Matrix for Agricultural Development, Cornell University, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Nelson, G.C. and Panggabean, M. (1991), “The Costs of Indonesian Sugar Policy: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 703–712.Google Scholar
Rosegrant, M.W., Kasryno, F., Gonzales, L.A., Rasahan, C. and Saefudin, Y. (1987), Price and Investment Policies in the Indonesian Food Crop Sector, IFPRI, Washington D.C. and CAER, Bogor, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Sarma, J.S. (1986), Cereal Feed Use in the Third World: Past Trends and Projections to 2000, Research Report 57, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Scandizzo, P.L. and Bruce, C. (1980), Methodologies for Measuring Agricultural Price Intervention Effects, Staff Working Paper No. 394, The World Bank, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Schiff, Maurice and Valdes, Alberto (1992), The Political Economy of Agricultural Pricing Policy, Volume 4 (A Synthesis of the Economics in Developing Countries), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Setboonsarng, S. (1989), Comparative Advantage in Livestock and Feed Grain Production in Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand, Thailand Development Research Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J., Wainio, J. and Roningen, V. (1989), A Database for Trade Liberalisation Studies, Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C. Google Scholar
Tyers, R. and Anderson, K. (1985), Economic Growth and Agricultural Protection in East and Southeast Asia, ASEAN-Australia Economic Papers No. 21, ASEAN-Australia Joint Research Project, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar