Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:00:56.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalization and Northeast Agriculture: Implications of the Upcoming Round of World Trade Negotiations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

David Blandford
David Blandford*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology at The Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Abstract

The signing of the Uruguay Round agreement on agriculture (URAA) in 1994 was a significant step towards the liberalization of world agricultural trade. A new round of negotiations on agriculture is scheduled to begin under the auspices of the World Trade Organization (WTO) at the end of 1999. This paper discusses the likely agenda of those negotiations and their implications for agriculture in the northeastern United States.

Type
Invited Presentations
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , October 1999 , pp. 128 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blandford, D. 1990. “The Costs of Agricultural Protection and the Difference Free Trade Would Make.” In Sanderson, F. (ed.) Agricultural Protectionism in the Industrialized World. Resources for the Future, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Blandford, D., and Dewbre, J. 1994. “Structural Adjustment and Learning to Live without Subsidies in OECD Countries.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 1047–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blandford, D., and Fulponi, L. 1999. “Emerging Public Concerns in Agriculture: Domestic Policies and International Trade Commitments. (General Issues and a Case Study of Animal Welfare).” European Review of Agricultural Economics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. 1999. “Overview of Developments in the World Dairy Market.” Paper presented at the 5th Hosltein Congress of the Americas, 12-16 April. Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
Josling, T.E., Tangermann, S., and Warley, T.K. 1996. Agriculture in the GATT. St. Martin's Press, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoblauch, W.A., and Putnam, L.D. 1998. Dairy Farm Management Business Summary. New York State 1997. Research Bulletin 98-06. Department of Agricultural, Resource and Managerial Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1995. The Uruguay Round: a Preliminary Evaluation of the Impacts of the Agreement on Agriculture in the OECD Countries. Paris.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1997. The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture and Processed Agricultural Products. Paris.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1999. OECD Agricultural Outlook, 1999-2004. Paris.Google Scholar
Penn State, College of Agricultural Sciences, Cooperative Extension. 1998. 1997 Pennsylvania Dairy Farm Business Analysis. Prepared by the Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Faram Bureau Members’ Services Corporation. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. 1998. Dairy Market Statistics 1997 Annual Summary. Washington DC.Google Scholar