Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T10:51:26.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Farmland Preservation and Differential Taxation: Evaluating Optimal Policy Under Conditions of Uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Robert J. Johnston
Robert J. Johnston*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, and associate director, Sea Grant College Program, University of Connecticut
Get access

Abstract

Differential property tax policy for farmland is often set under conditions of uncertainty and limited information regarding landowners’ objective functions. This study examines optimal differential tax policy for a parcel of agricultural land facing uncertain development, identifying instances in which common farmland taxation policies may be non-optimal. Optimal tax rates are characterized given three possible causes of uncertain development: exogenous offers from developers, tax-related reductions in landowner wealth, and a combination of these factors. Model results indicate that underlying causes of uncertain development are critical when seeking to assess the optimality of differential taxation policies, and the use of a single, time-invariant differential tax levy is rarely optimal given uncertain development.

Keywords

differential taxationfarmland preservationland conversionoptimal controloptimal policyproperty taxuncertainty
Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , October 2003 , pp. 198 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. E. (1986). “Property Taxes and the Timing of Urban Land Development.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 16(4), 483–492.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. E. (1993). “Use Value Property Tax Assessment: Effects on Land Development.” Land Economics 69(3), 263–269.Google Scholar
Bentick, B. L. (1979). “The Impact of Taxation and Valuation Practices on the Timing and Efficiency of Land Use.” Journal of Political Economy 87(4), 859–868.Google Scholar
Bentick, B. L. (1997). “The Economic Effects (Neutrality) of Taxes on Land.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 56(3), 369–371.Google Scholar
Bentick, B. L., and Pogue, T. F. (1988). “The Impact on Development Timing of Property and Profit Taxation.” Land Economics 64(4), 317–324.Google Scholar
Capozza, D. R., and Helsley, R. W. (1989). “The Fundamentals of Land Prices and Urban Growth.” Journal of Urban Economics 26(3), 295–306.Google Scholar
Clark, C. W. (1971). “Economically Optimal Policies for the Utilization of Biologically Renewable Resources.” Mathematical Biosciences 12(3-4), 245–260.Google Scholar
Clarke, H. R., and Reed, W. J. (1994). “Consumption/Pollution Tradeoffs in an Environment Vulnerable to Pollution Related Catastrophic Collapse.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18(5), 991–1010.Google Scholar
Cropper, M. L. (1976). “Regulating Activities with Catastrophic Environmental Effects.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 3(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P., and Heal, G. (1974). “The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources.” Review of Economic Studies 41 [special volume for the Symposium on the Economics of Natural Resources], 3-28.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P., and Stiglitz, J. (1981). “Resource Depletion Under Technological Uncertainty.” Econometrica 49(1), 85–104.Google Scholar
England, R. W., and Mohr, R. D. (2003, April). “Land Development and Current Use Assessment: A Theoretical Note.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32(1), 46–52.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. T. (1988). “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Use-Value Programs.” Property Tax Journal 7, 157–165.Google Scholar
Hennessy, D. A. (1999). “The Taxpayer Relief Act, Estate Planning, and Resource Mobility in U.S. Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(3), 534–543.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. J., and Sutinen, J. G. (1996). “Uncertain Biomass Shift and Collapse: Implications for Harvest Policy in the Fishery.” Land Economics 72(4), 500–518.Google Scholar
Lopez, R., Shah, F., and Altobello, M. (1994). “Amenity Benefits and the Optimal Allocation of Land.” Land Economics 70(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
Parks, P. J., and Quimio, W. R. H. (1996, April). “Preserving Agricultural Land with Farmland Assessment: New Jersey as a Case Study.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 25(1), 22–27.Google Scholar
Reed, W. J. (1984). “The Effects of the Risk of Fire on the Optimal Rotation of a Forest.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11(2), 180–190.Google Scholar
Reed, W. J. (1988). “Optimal Harvesting of a Fishery Subject to Random Catastrophic Collapse.” IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine and Biology 5, 215–255.Google Scholar
Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management. (2002). Rules and Regulations for Enforcement of the Farm, Forest, and Open Space Act. Providence, RI: State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations.Google Scholar
Rose, L. A. (1973). “The Development Value Tax.” Urban Studies 10(2), 271–275.Google Scholar
Shoup, D. (1970). “The Optimal Timing of Urban Land Development.” Papers of the Regional Science Association 25, 33–44.Google Scholar
Skouras, A. (1978). “The Non-Neutrality of Land Taxation.” Public Finance 33(1-2), 113–134.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, G. (1997). “Land Taxes in Agriculture: Preferential Rate and Assessment Effects.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 56(2), 215–228.Google Scholar