Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T23:29:33.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Changing Rural Policy Context: Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Steven E. Hastings  and
Gerald L. Cole
Steven E. Hastings
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station, College of Agricultural Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19717–1303
Gerald L. Cole
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station, College of Agricultural Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19717–1303
Get access

Abstract

This paper discusses a paper presented by Stephen Smith at the 1995 annual meeting of the Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association. Smith presented key issues that have changed the context for rural development policy in the United States. We propose that the induced innovation model of economic development can be used to identify a variety of ways that LGU's can contribute to developing and delivering appropriate rural economic development programs. These ways include assisting rural communities in identifying comparative advantage, identifying and/or providing relevant resource persons, delivering appropriate educational programs and conducting research on important issues. The success of LGU's in these areas will depend on their willingness to undertake these activities and their ability to recognize and adapt to current to future economic and social realities affecting rural America.

Type
Invited Presentation
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , October 1995 , pp. 146 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bender, L.D., Green, B.L., Hady, T.F., Kuehn, J.A., Nelson, M.K., Perkinson, L.B., and Ross, P.J. The Diverse Social and Economic Structure of Rural America. USDA, ERS, Rural Development Research Report No. 49, 1985.Google Scholar
Deavers, K.L. “Rural Development-Rural Reality: Efficiency, Equity, Public Goods and the Future of Rural Policy.” Hibbard Memorial Lecture Series, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 20, 1990.Google Scholar
Deavers, K.L. “Rural Development in the 1990s: Data and Research Needs.” In Rural Information Needs, Buse, R.C. and Driscoll, J.L., Editors. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp. 24–51, 1992.Google Scholar
Kelsey, T.W. “Fiscal Impacts of Population Growth and Decline in Small Communities.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, No. 5 (1993): 1169–72.Google Scholar
Loveridge, S., and Schmid, A.A. “Strategic Planning and Population Settlement.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, No. 5 (1993): 1161–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulver, G.C. “Elements of a Sustainable Rural Policy.” In Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies—1994, Farm Foundation, Oak Brook, Illinois, January 1995.Google Scholar
Stevens, R.D., and Jabara, C.J. Agricultural Development Principles. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp. 89–90, 1988.Google Scholar