Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T17:35:59.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatial Market Integration: Definition, Theory, and Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Kevin McNew*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland
Get access

Abstract

A point-space model of interregional trade is used to define market integration and to explore its implications for modeling spatial price relationships. This analysis indicates that spatial prices are related nonlinearly, contrary to much of the work on spatial price analysis which uses linear models. As an empirical example, corn market integration along the Mississippi River is examined during the Midwest flood of 1993. Higher transport costs during this period significantly reduced the extent of integration and thereby decreased excess demand shock transference across regions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardeni, P.G., “Does the Law of One Price Really Hold for Commodity Prices?American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (1989): 661–69.Google Scholar
Baffes, J.Some Further Evidence on the Law of One Price: The Law of One Price Still Holds.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (1991): 1264–73.Google Scholar
Blank, S., and Schmiesing, B.Modeling of Agricultural Markets and Prices Using Causality and Path Analysis.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 10 (1988): 3548.Google Scholar
Florian, M., and Los, M.A New Look at Static Spatial Price Equilibrium Models.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 12 (1982): 579–97.Google Scholar
Gardner, B.L., and Brooks, K.M.Food Prices and Market Integration in Russia: 1992–93.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (1994): 641–46.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B.K.Multivariate Cointegration Tests and the Law of One Price in International Wheat Markets.” Review of Agricultural Economics 14 (1992): 117–24.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B.K., and Schroeder, T.C.Cointegration Tests and Spatial Price Linkages in Regional Cattle Markets.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (1991): 452–64.Google Scholar
Harriss, B., “There Is Method in My Madness: Or Is It Vice Versa?Food Research Institute Studies 17 (1979): 197218.Google Scholar
McCallum, B.T.Unit Roots in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Critical Issues.” Economic Quarterly (Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond) 92(Spring 1993): 1343.Google Scholar
Mundlak, Y., and Larson, D.On the Transmission of World Agricultural Prices.” World Bank Economic Review 6 (1992): 399422.Google Scholar
Protopapadakis, A., and Stoll, H.R.Spot and Futures Prices and the Law of One Price.” Journal of Finance 38 (1983): 1431–55.Google Scholar
Ravallion, M.Testing Market Integration.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1986): 102–9.Google Scholar
Roll, R.Violations of Purchasing Power Parity and Their Implications for Efficient International Commodity Markets.” in International Finance and Trade, Vol. 1, ed. Sarnat, M. and Szego, G.P., 133–76. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1979.Google Scholar
Sakong, Y., Hayes, D.J., and Hallam, A.Hedging Production Risk with Options.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75 (1993): 408–15.Google Scholar
Takayama, T., and Judge, G.G. Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1971.Google Scholar
USDA-AMS (Agricultural Marketing Service). Grain and Feed Market News. Various issues, 1992–94.Google Scholar
Williams, C., and Bewley, R.The Transmission of Price Information of Queensland Cattle Auctions.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 37 (1993): 3355.Google Scholar
Williams, J.C., and Wright, B.D. Storage and Commodity Markets. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar