Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T23:17:39.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Later Life Satisfaction and Household Structure: Living with Others and Living Alone*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Alfred P. Fengler ,
Nicholas Danigelis  and
Virginia C. Little
Alfred P. Fengler
Affiliation:
University of Vermont, Department of Sociology, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Nicholas Danigelis
Affiliation:
University of Vermont, Department of Sociology, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Virginia C. Little
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut, School of Social Work, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a survey of 1,400 older Americans over 65, two household structures, elders living with others and elders living alone, were compared with older married couples. Results indicated that elders living with others had a greater degree of incapacity and lower income than married couples, but on most indices there were few differences. Elders in three-generation families had somewhat lower general life satisfaction, but the greatest number of elderly people with low life satisfaction were widows who lived alone. Widows living alone were less likely than married couples to own their homes and more likely to perceive that their income was inadequate, that transportation needs were unmet and that no one would care for them in an emergency, all conditions strongly associated with low life satisfaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , November 1983 , pp. 357 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

References

NOTES

1 United Nations. Report on the World Assembly on Aging, Vienna, 26 07 to 6 08 1982, New York, 1982 A/CONF. 113/31.Google Scholar

2 Townsend, P.The Family Life of Old People. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1957.Google Scholar

3 Shanas, E. and Streib, G. (eds.). Social Structure and the Family: Generational Relations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1965.Google Scholar

4 Shanas, E. and Sussman, M. (eds.). Family, Bureaucracy, and the Elderly. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 1977.Google Scholar

5 Shanas, E., Townsend, P., Wedderburn, D., Friis, H., Milhøj, and Stehouver, J.Old People in Three Industrial Societies. Atherton, NY, 1968.Google Scholar

6 Lawton, M. P. Environments and living arrangements. In United Nations Fund for Population Activities, International Perspectives on Aging: Population and Policy Challenges Binstock, R., Chow, Wing-sun and Schulz, J. (eds). New York, 1982.Google Scholar

7 Maeda, D. The family as a source of support for the elderly in Japan. Paper given at the Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Boston, MA, 11 1982.Google Scholar

8 Palmore, E.The Honorable Elders: A Cross-cultural Analysis of Aging in Japan. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 1975.Google Scholar

9 Troll, L., Miller, S. and Atchely, R.Families in Later Life. Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA, 1979.Google Scholar

10 Shanas, E.Older people and their families: the new pioneers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35 (1973), 108–116.Google Scholar

11 Lopata, H. Z.Widowhood in an American city. Schenkman, Cambridge, MA, 1973.Google Scholar

12 Kerckhoff, A. Family patterns and morale in retirement. In Simpson, I. and McKinney, J. (eds). Social Aspects of Aging. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 1966.Google Scholar

13 Donahue, W. Living in the four-generational family. Living in the Multi-Generational Family. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 1969.Google Scholar

14 Chevan, A. and Korson, J. H.The widowed who live alone: an examination of social and demographic factors. Social Forces, 51 (1972), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Kivett, V. and Learner, M.Situational influences on the morale of older rural adults in child-shared housing: a comparative analysis. Gerontologist, 22 (1982), 100–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

16 Larson, R.Thirty years of research onthe subjective well-being of older Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 33 (1978), 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Little, V. C.Open Care for the Aging: Comparative International Approaches. Springer, New York, 1982.Google Scholar

18 Bradburn, N. and Caplowitz, D.Reports on Happiness. Aldine, Chicago, 1965.Google Scholar

19 Jensen, L. I., Fengler, A. P. and Schmidt, F. E. Alienation among the elderly: a rural-urban exploration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, Burlington, VT, 08 1979.Google Scholar

20 Fengler, A. P., Little, V. C. and Danigelis, N. L.Correlates of dimensions of happiness in urban and non-urban settings. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 16 (1) (1983), 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 Rosenmayr, L. and Hörl, J. Assistance to the elderly as a common task of the family and social service organizations. Paper presented at the Xllth International Congress of Gerontology, Hamburg, W. Germany, 1981.Google Scholar

22 Davis-Friedmann, D.Long Life or Long Lives, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1983.Google Scholar

23 Gumming, E. and Henry, W. E.Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement. Basic Books, New York, 1961.Google Scholar

24 Wood, V. and Robertson, J. The significance of grandparenthood. In Gubrium, J. (ed.). Time, Roles and Self in Old Age. Human Sciences Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar

25 Lipman, A. and Longino, C. The wife, the widow, and the old maid: support network differentials of older women. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Diego, C A, 11 1980.Google Scholar

26 Rosenberg, G. and Anspach, D.Sibling solidarity in the working class. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35 (1973), 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Lee, G. and Massey, M.Rural-urban differences among the elderly: economic, social, and subjective factors. Journal of Social Issues, 36 (1980), 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Fengler, A. P. and Jensen, L. I.Perceived and objective conditions as predictors of the life satisfaction of urban and non-urban elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 36 (1981), 750–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Treas, J.Family support for the aged. Gerontologist, 17 (1977), 486–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

30 Peace, S. M.An International Perspective on the Status of Older Women. International Federation on Ageing, Washington, DC., 1981.Google Scholar

31 Blau, Z.Aging in a Changing Society. Franklin Watts, New York, 1981.Google Scholar

32 Fengler, A. P. and Danigelis, N. L. The shared home: assessment of interest and need. Paper presented at Systems Science in Health-Social Services for the Elderly and the Disabled, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 07 1983.Google Scholar

33 Pritchard, D.The art of matchmaking: a case study in shared housing. Gerontologist, 23 (1983). 174–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

34 Heumann, L. F. and Boldy, D.Housing for the Elderly: Planning and Policy Formulation in Western Europe and North America. St Martin's Press, N.Y., 1982.Google Scholar

35 Fengler, A. P. and Danigelis, N. L.Residence, the elderly widow and life satisfaction. Research on Aging, 4 (1982), 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Fengler, A. P., Danigelis, N. L. and Grams, A.Marital status and life satisfaction among the elderly. International Journal of the Sociology of the Family, 12 (1982), 63–76.Google Scholar