Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T18:40:49.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inequality in active ageing: evidence from a new individual-level index for European countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2017

MIKKEL BARSLUND*
Affiliation:
Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, Belgium.
MARTEN VON WERDER
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany.
ASGHAR ZAIDI
Affiliation:
Centre for Research on Ageing, University of Southampton, United Kingdom.
*
Address for correspondence: Mikkel Barslund, Centre for European Policy Studies, 1 Place du Congrès, 1000 Brussels, Belgium E-mail: Mikkel.barslund@ceps.eu

Abstract

In the context of emerging challenges and opportunities associated with population ageing, the study of inequality in active-ageing outcomes is critical to the design of appropriate and effective social policies. While there is much discussion about active ageing at the aggregate country level, little is known about inequality in active-ageing experiences within countries. Based on the existing literature on active ageing, this paper proposes an individual-level composite active ageing index based on Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) data. The individual-level nature of the index allows us to analyse inequality in experiences of active ageing within selected European countries. One important motivation behind measuring active ageing at the individual level is that it allows for a better understanding of unequal experiences of ageing, which may otherwise be masked in aggregate-level measures of active ageing. Results show large differences in the distribution of individual-level active ageing across the 13 European countries covered and across age groups. Furthermore, there is a positive association between the country-level active ageing index and the equality of its distribution within a country. Hence, countries with the lowest average active ageing index tend to have the most unequal distribution in active-ageing experiences. For nine European countries, where temporal data are also available, we find that inequality in active-ageing outcomes decreased in the period 2004 to 2013.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, B. and Marlier, E. 2010. Income and Living Conditions in Europe. Eurostat, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Boudiny, K. 2013. ‘Active ageing’: from empty rhetoric to effective policy tool. Ageing & Society, 33, 6, 1077–98.Google Scholar
Breza, M. and Perek-Bialas, J. 2014. The Active Ageing Index and its Extension to the Regional Level. Host country paper, peer review in Poland. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=12940&langId=en [Accessed 26 April 2017].Google Scholar
Cann, P. and Dean, M. (eds) 2009. Unequal Ageing: The Untold Story of Exclusion in Old Age. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Corsi, M. and Samek, L. 2010. Gender Mainstreaming Active Inclusion Policies. Report prepared by the EGGSI Network. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=6335&langId=en [Accessed 26 April 2017].Google Scholar
Eurostat 2011. Active Ageing and Solidarity Between Generations – A Statistical Portrait of the European Union 2012. Eurostat, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Foster, L. and Walker, A. 2013. Gender and active ageing in Europe. European Journal of Ageing, 10, 1, 310.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Z. and Bowling, A. 2004. Quality of life from the perspectives of older people. Ageing & Society, 24, 5, 675–91.Google Scholar
Idler, E. L. and Benyamini, Y. 1999. Community studies reporting association between self-rated health and mortality. Research on Aging, 21, 3, 392401.Google Scholar
Kaneda, T., Lee, M. and Pollard, K. 2011. The SCL/PRB Index of Well-being in Older Populations. Population Reference Bureau, Washington DC. Available online at http://www.prb.org/pdf11/SCL-PRBIndexofWellBeing.pdf [Accessed 26 April 2017].Google Scholar
Milligan, K. and Wise, D. A. 2015. Health and work at older ages: using mortality to assess the capacity to work across countries. Population Ageing, 8, 1, 2750.Google Scholar
Myck, M., Oczkowska, M. and Duda, D. 2015. Innovations for better understanding deprivation and social exclusion. In Malter, F. and Börsch-Supan, A. (eds), SHARE Wave 5: Innovations & Methodology. Munich Center for the Economics of Ageing, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD, European Commission and Joint Research Centre, Paris.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2011. Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Paúl, C., Ribeiro, O. and Teixeira, L. 2012. Active ageing: an empirical approach to the WHO model. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 2012, Article ID 382972.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-first Century. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Stenner, P., McFarquhar, T. and Bowling, A. 2011. Older people and ‘active ageing’: subjective aspects of ageing actively. Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 3, 467–77.Google Scholar
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) 2012 a. Active ageing. UNECE Policy Brief on Ageing 13, UNECE, Geneva.Google Scholar
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) 2012 b. Active Ageing and Quality of Life in Old Age. ECE/WG.1/16. Available online at http://www.unece.org/index.php?id=30027 [Accessed 26 April 2017].Google Scholar
Walker, A. 2005. A European perspective on quality of life in old age. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 1, 212.Google Scholar
Walker, A. and Maltby, T. 2012. Active ageing: a strategic policy solution to demographic ageing in the European Union. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21, s1, 117–30.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. and Pickett, K. 2009. The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. Allen Lane, London.Google Scholar
World Health Organization 2002. Active Ageing – A Policy Framework. Available online at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/67215/1/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf [Accessed 26 April 2017].Google Scholar
Zaidi, A. 2015. Creating and using the evidence base: the case of the Active Ageing Index. Contemporary Social Science, 10, 2, 148–59.Google Scholar
Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Hofmarcher, M., Lelkes, O., Marin, B., Rodrigues, R., Schmidt, A., Vanhuysse, P. and Zolyomi, E. 2013. Active Ageing Index 2012 – Concept, Methodology and Final Results. European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Vienna. Available online at http://www.euro.centre.org/data/1453740620_84975.pdf [Accessed 26 April 2017].Google Scholar
Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Zolyomi, E., Schmidt, A., Rodrigues, R. and Marin, B. 2017. Measuring active and healthy ageing in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 27, 2, 138–57.Google Scholar
Zaidi, A., Harper, S., Howse, K., Lamura, G. and Perek-Białas, J. Building Evidence for Active Ageing Policies: Active Ageing Index and its Potential, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Zaidi, A. and Stanton, D. 2015. Active Ageing Index 2014: Analytical Report. Report prepared for the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (Geneva) and the European Commission's Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (Brussels). Available online at http://www1.unece.org/stat/platform/download/attachments/76287849/AAI%20Report%20LOW%20RES.PDF [Accessed 26 April 2017].Google Scholar