Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T18:41:16.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Size of States and Political Stability in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Ọmọlade Adejuyigbe*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

Extract

…the essential thing is, as John Stuart Mill says, that “there should not be any one state so much more powerful than the rest as to be capable of vying in strength with many of them combined. If there be such a one, and only one, it will insist on being master of the joint deliberations: if there be two they will be irresistible when they agree: and whenever they differ everything will be decided by a struggle for ascendancy between the rivals” (Wheare 1963, pp. 50-51).

The imbalance in the sizes of the former regions of Nigeria (Table 1) had been frequently cited as one of the main reasons for political instability of the federation. For example, the Premier of the Eastern Region and leader of one of the political parties which contested the federal elections of 1964 declared during the election campaigns that

We hold the view that the two worst threats to Nigerian unity are the practice of regionalism which has now been carried into the political field and the fact that the most important principle of federation, namely, that there should not be any one state so much greater than the rest combined that it can bend the will of the federal government. Until these two threats are removed, they labor in vain who labor for Nigerian unity and solidarity (Okpara 1965, p. 5).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Adejuyigbe, Omolade. “The Problems of Unity and the Creation of States in Nigeria.” Nigerian Geographical Journal, II (1968), 3960.Google Scholar
Adejuyigbe, Omolade. “Alternatives to Twelve States in Nigeria.” Journal of Asian and African Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Ake, Claude. “Political Integration and Political Stability: A Hypothesis.” World Politics, XIX (1966/1967), 486499.Google Scholar
Atuko, S. A.How Many Nigerians? An Analysis of Nigeria's Census Problems 1961-1963.” Journal of Modern African Studies, III (1965), 371392.Google Scholar
Awolowo, O. Thoughts on Nigerian Constitution. Ibadan: Oxford University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Azikwe, N.Essentials for Nigerian Survival.” Foreign Affairs, XLIII (1964/1965), 447461.Google Scholar
Dudley, B. J.Federalism and the Balance of Political Power in Nigeria’. Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies, IV (1966), 1629.Google Scholar
Eastern Nigeria. January 15 Before and After. Enugu, 1967.Google Scholar
Nigeria, Federal Republic of. Report of the Fiscal Review Commission. Prepared by Binns, K. J.. Lagos: Government Printer, 1965.Google Scholar
Nigeria, Federal Republic of. Memoranda Submitted by the Delegations to the Ad-hoc Conferernce on Constitutional Proposals for Nigeria. Lagos: National Nigerian Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Nigeria, Federal Republic of. Recurrent Estimates 1970/71. Lagos: Federal Ministry of Information, 1970.Google Scholar
Nigerian Opinion. Nigeria, 1965 Crisis and Criticism: Selections from Nigerian Opinion. Ibadan: Ibadan University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Okpara, M. Nigerian Outlook. Enugu, October 14, 1965.Google Scholar
Report by the Resumed Nigeria Constitutional Conference Held in London in September and October, 1958. Lagos: Government Printer, 1958.Google Scholar
Wheare, K. C. Federal Government. 4th ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar