Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T12:01:43.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methodological Considerations in the Study of African Political and Administrative Behavior: The Case of Role Conflict Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Alvin Magid
Alvin Magid*
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Albany, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The literature on political and administrative behavior in sub-Saharan Africa has proliferated at an unprecedented rate in the past decade. But notwithstanding an impressive output, Africanist political scientists of all persuasions—“institutionalists,” “behavioralists,” and so forth--have tended to ignore or treat lightly various methodological problems confronting the social sciences in general and their own discipline in particular. It is appropriate here to distinguish between methodology and preocedure. Methodology refers to the philosophy of science, to problems associated with the logic of systematic social inquiry; among the problems which are essentially methodological are classification, comparison, concept formation, theory construction, and nomothetic vs. idiographic inquiry. (Various methodological probems are examined by Brodbeck 1968, Hempel 1965, Kaplan 1964, Nagel 1961, and Natanson 1963.) Procedure, in contrast, refers to the application of specific techniques in research. While research techniques inform the day-to-day activity of systematic social inquiry, they are extraneous to the logic of that inquiry (Fleron 1968, p. 316).

The extent to which political scientists are attentive to methodology is often reflected in the quality of their research, Not surprisingly, therefore, the quality of research on political and administrative behavior in sub-Saharan Africa has been negatively affected by the tendency to dismiss or de-emphasize methodological considerations. For example, there appears to be little awareness of a cardinal principle of logical classification: that there must be “a mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive set of classes for the domain under consideration” (Kalleberg 1966, p. 72; Hempel 1952, p. 51).

Type
Research Article
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , April 1970 , pp. 75 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Ackerman, Nathan. “Social Role and Total Personality.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, XXI (1951), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apter, David. The Political Kingdom in Uganda: A Study in Bureaucratic Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Bettie, John. Bunyoro: An African Kingdom. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1960.Google Scholar
Brodbeck, May, ed. Readings in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar
Burchard, Waldo W. “Role Conflicts of Military Chaplains.” American Sociological Review, IXX, 5 (October 1954, 528–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Fred. “The Role of the Chief in Uganda.” Journal of African Administration, X, 3 (July 1958), 153–160.Google Scholar
Burke, Fred. Local Government and Politics in Uganda. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Cottrell, Leonard S. Jr. “The Adjustment of the Individual to His Age and Sex Roles.” American Sociological Review, VII, 5 (October 1942), 617–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science, II (1957), 201–215.Google Scholar
Dollard, John et al. Frustration and Aggression. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Eaton, Ralph. General Logic. New York: Scribner's, 1959.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. “Bureaucracy, Bureaucratization, and Debureaucratization.” Administrative Science Quarterly, IV (December 1959), 302–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Rupert. “Parties and National Integration in Africa.” In LaPalombara, Jospeh and Weiner, Myron, eds. Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966. Pp. 267–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallers, Lloyd. “The Predicament of the Modern African Chief: An Instance from Uganda.” American Anthropologist, LVII (1955), 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleron, Frederic J. Jr. “Soviet Area Studies and the Social Sciences: Some Methodological Problems in Communist Studies.” Soviet Studies, IXX, 3 (January 1968), 313–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getzels, J. W. and Guba, E. G.. “Role, Role Conflict, and Effectiveness.” American Sociological Review, IXX, 2 (April 1954), 164–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Center, 1956.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max et al. “The Village Headman in British Central Africa.” Africa, IXX (April 1949), 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neal et al. Explorations in Role Analysis: Studies of the School Superintendency Role. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl. Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, Talcott, eds. and trans. Max Weber: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Oxford University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Hospers, John. An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1953.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Eugene et al. “The Use of the Role Concept in the Study of Complex Organizations.” Journal of Social Issues, VII, 3 (1951), 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Robert et al. Organizational Stress. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, Arthur. “The Logic of Comparison: A Methodological Note on the Comparative Study of Political Systems.” World Politics, XIX, 1 (October 1966), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Abraham. The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. San Francisco: Chandler, 1964.Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu and Eisenstadt, S. N.. “Some Sociological Observations on the Response of Israeli Organizations to New Immigrants.” Administrative Science Quarterly, V (1960-1961), 113–133.Google Scholar
Kerlinger, Fred. Foundations of Behavioral Research: Educational and Psychological Inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1965.Google Scholar
Magid, Alvin. District Councilorship in an African Society: A Study in Role and Conflict Resolution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 1965.Google Scholar
Magid, Alvin. “Dimensions of Administrative Role and Conflict Resolution Among Local Officials in Northern Nigeria.” Administrative Science Quarterly, XII (September 1967), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natanson, Maurice, ed. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. New York: Random House, 1963.Google Scholar
Neiman, Lionel J. and Hughes, James W.. “The Problem of the Concept of Role: A Re-Survey of the Literature.” Social Forces, XXX, 2 (December 1951), 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. The Social System. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Riggs, Fred. “The Ambivalence of Feudalism and Bureaucracy in Traditional Societies.” Paper delivered at the 1964 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 1964.Google Scholar
Seeman, Melvin. “Role Conflict and Ambivalence in Leadership.” American Sociological Review, XVIII, 4 (August 1953), 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, John. “The Resolution of Role Conflict Within the Family.” Psychiatry, XX (February 1957), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1968.Google Scholar
Toby, Jackson. “Some Variables in Role Conflict Analysis.” Social Forces, XXX, 3 (March 1952), 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Ralph H. “The Navy Disbursing Officer as a Bureaucrat.” American Sociological Review, XII, 3 (June 1947), 342–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Ralph H. “Role-Taking, Role Standpoint, and Reference-Group Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology, LXI, 4 (January 1956), 316–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uganda. Report of the Uganda Relationships Commission. Entebbe, Uganda: Government Printer, 1961.Google Scholar
Wardwell, Walter I. “The Reduction of Strain in a Marginal Social Role.” American Journal of Sociology, LXI, 1 (July 1955), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetterberg, Hans. On Theory and Verification in Sociology. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1954.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide. Creating Political Order: The Party-States of West Africa. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.Google Scholar