Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T17:12:04.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State versus documentation: access to anti-apartheid viewpoints from within South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2022

Christopher Merrett
Get access

Extract

The purpose of this article is to highlight the significance of publication of antiapartheid periodicals within South Africa; to describe some of the difficulties under which researchers, writers and publishers operate; to attempt a categorization of this type of material; and to explain why the documentalist and indexer plays an important role in the study and understanding of present, and future, South African society. Excluded from this survey are literary and creative publications which could also be classified as anti-apartheid.

There exists in South Africa a long and honourable tradition of antiapartheid periodical publishing. The response from those who hold the reins of power has been a vigorous campaign of censorship which, in the context of South Africa's political economy, may be seen as a logical necessity.

Type
Articles
Information
African Research and Documentation , Volume 50 , 1989 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © African Research & Documentation 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Merrett, C.E. Librarians in a police state : South African academic libraries and the problem of censorship. Journal oflibrarianship. Vol. 20(3) July 1988, p. 181-193.Google Scholar
Publications and Entertainment Act of 1963; Publications Act of 1974; and the Publications Amendment Act of 1987.Google Scholar
The most notorious were the Suppression of Communism Act of 1950; Unlawful Organizations Act of 1960; Terrorism Act of 1967; and the General Law Amendment Acts of 1963, 1964, 1966 and 1969.Google Scholar
Information, freedom and censorship : the Article 19 World report… London: Longman, 1988, p. 43.Google Scholar
Detention without trial is possible under two Acts. The Internal Security Act of 1982 provides for preventive detention (s.28 and s. 50), interrogative detention (s.29), and detention as a potential State witness (s.31). The Public Safety Act of 1953, under which the current State of Emergency operates, allows for detention for any purpose.Google Scholar
The following have been suspended: New nation 22 March to 10 June 1988 South 10 May to 10 June 1988 Weekly mail 1 Nov to 28 Nov 1988 Grassroots 17 Feb to 16 May 1989 New era 17 Feb to 16 May 1989Google Scholar
Human Rights Commission. Fact paper no. 1 (1988), p. 4.Google Scholar
Frankel, P.H. Pretoria's praetorians : civil-military relations in South Africa. Cambridge: C.U.P., 1984, p. 51.Google Scholar
Merrett, C.E. Censorship and the destruction of documentation centres in South Africa. New library world 90 (1068) June 1989, p. 105-106.Google Scholar
Aitchison, J.J.W. Numbering the dead: patterns in the Midlands violence. Pietermaritzburg: Centre for Adult Education, University of Natal, 1988.Google Scholar
In, February 1989 the organizer of the Ashdown Advice Office, Pietermaritzburg, Sipho Maloko, was killed and his car burned out. Four colleagues were detained.Google Scholar
Weekly mail index produced by the University Library, University of Natal, P.O. Box 375, Pietermaritzburg 3200 (available January 1987 to date).Google Scholar
Available from the writer of this article at University Library, University of Natal, P.O. Box 375, Pietermaritzburg 3200 .Google Scholar
Shier, J. Index to South African labour bulletin, volumes 1-10. In: MAREE, J. The independent trade unions, 1974-1984: ten years of the South African labour bulletin. Johannesburg: Ravan, 1987.Google Scholar
Green, Andrew. The politics of indexing. Assistant librarian April 1986, p. 52-53.Google Scholar