Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T17:12:03.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Documentation and Freedom of Information in the New South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2022

Christopher Merrett
Christopher Merrett*
Affiliation:
University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
Get access

Extract

One of the key elements in the maintenance of freedom of information and comprehensive documentation lies in the strength of civil society. This may be defined as that part of the nation which is critically and historically conscious, articulate and non-deferential, and independent of the state. South Africa has a long and proud tradition of strong institutions and individuals that have underpinned a durable civil society. Its tenacity, as well as its links to the international community, may be seen as one of the major reasons for the ultimate failure of apartheid ideology. From 1960 to 1980, the main contribution of civil society was to document and circulate information that contested the legitimacy of the state. The work of academics, clerics, journalists, lawyers and trade unionists became a (and at certain times the) major form of opposition and resistance to the government.

Type
Articles
Information
African Research and Documentation , Volume 76 , 1998 , pp. 5 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © African Research & Documentation 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and references

Johnson, R.W. On the way to first base. London review of books, Vol.l8(20) 17 October 1996, p.23.Google Scholar
Bernstein, H. Discovering exiles. Southern African review of books, July/August 1993, p.12.Google Scholar
Pimlott, B. Frustrate their knavish tricks: writings on biography, history and politics.London: Harper Collins, 1995, p.364.Google Scholar
Klima, I. Literature and memory. In: The spirit of Prague and other essays. New York: Granta, 1996, p.37.Google Scholar
See, for instance, Bernstein, H. The rift: the exile experience of South Africans. London: Cape, 1994.Google Scholar
Armscor is the State-owned corporation responsible for the development, manufacture and marketing of weaponry.Google Scholar
Formerly Eastern Transvaal.Google Scholar
Report of the Independent Electoral Commission: the South African elections of April 1994. Johannesburg: Independent Electoral Commission, 1994.Google Scholar
The most complete account can be found in Johnson, R.W. and Schlemmer, L. (eds.) Launching democracy in South Africa: the first open election, April 1994. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Chief bars press from his area. Natal Witness, 29 January 1997, p.4.Google Scholar
Beresford, D. Here come the thought police. Mail and Guardian, Vol.l2(41) 11 October 1996, p.4.Google Scholar
Only the Mail and Guardian (formerly Weekly Mail) has survived from a list that included Grassroots, New African, New Nation, South and Vrye Weekblad.Google Scholar
Parker, I. The reporter as poet. Independent on Sunday, 18 September 1994.Google Scholar
Dangor, A. in Brink, A. (ed.) 27 April: een jaar later: one year later. Pretoria: Queillerie, 1995, p.47.Google Scholar