Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:30:52.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Warfare, oracles and iron: a case study of production among the pre-colonial Klowe, in the light of some recent Marxist analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

David Brown
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is perhaps surprising that the recent resurgence of interest in the application of Marxist theory to the study of the historically non-capitalist societies of the Third World should have focused, at least in part, upon the stateless societies of Africa. To some extent, this interest in some of the least differentiated and least class-stratified of societies can be related to the fundamental problematic of Marxist sociology: the characterization of the stage of advanced communism, which remains so obscure in Marx's own theoretical work. An understanding of the dynamics of ‘primitive’ communism might be seen, therefore, as an essential precursor to this underlying concern. Certainly, the often highly tendentious views of Marxist writers on such issues as the definition of the state and the extent of exploitation in the primitive communist mode can be related to this need. However, the rise of Marxist anthropology has not only been presented as a problem of general evolutionary theory. Other influences have been offered to account for the new concern, the most widely cited being the supposed crisis of functionalism, and the resulting necessity for a complete reorientation of the whole discipline of anthropology. Stateless societies, having long occupied a central place in the field of anthropological enquiry, and yet outwardly presenting such simplicity of form, offer a particular challenge to the radical, and in several recent works have been interpreted in what is claimed to be a novel and distinctive way.

Résumé

Conflits, oracles et fer: une étude de production chez les Klowe pré-coloniaux à la lueur de récentes analyses marxistes

Au cours des dernières années, les travaux visant à présenter des analyses marxistes de sociétés sans état ont attiré un intérêt considérable en anthropologie sociale. Il a été avancé que ces travaux rélèlent un engagement commun aux principes marxistes de matérialisme historique, maiś en réalité, on ne peut pas assumer qu'ils représentent tous de telles vues. Une division majeure existe entre certains écrivains comme Meillassoux, Dupré et Rey dont les analyses sont plus matérialistes que marxistes et qui mettent envaleur leś traits antagonistes des systèmes sans état, et d'autres tels que Godelier, Terray, Hindess et Hirst dont les analyses sont fondées sur des assomptions idéalistes, et qui défendent par dessus tout une determination fonctionaliste du système de parenté. Les représentants typiques de ce dernier groupe sont Hindess et Hirst, dont l'interprétation du ‘mode communiste primit if’ (1975) implique non seulement un faux amalgame de deux thèmes théoriques indépendants (une interprétation interactionnelle de la politique et une conception fonctionnaliste de l'état), mais aussi, une conception douteuse, non historique et dichotomique du sujet humain.

L'exemple du peuple Klowe et des peuples de Libéria de l'Est et de Côte d'lvoire de l'Ouest est utilisé pour explorer les implications de l'interprétation matérialiste et de la critique fonctionnaliste. Il y est défendu que la dernière approche n'arrive pas à percevoir la base politique de differéntiation social dans de telles sociétés, et que réciproquement, une grande partie des relations intérieures et extérieures du peuple Klowe au dix-neuvième siècle peuvent être comprises en termes de modèle de conflit.

La question de l'applicabilité du Marxisme aux études de sociétés sans état demeure par conséquent irrésolue.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 29 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aron, R. 1968. Main Currents in Sociological Thought – 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Asad, T. and Wolpe, H. 1976. ‘Concepts of modes of production’, Economy and Society, 4, 470–503.Google Scholar
Brownell, T. C. 1869. ‘Missionary exploration by a native’, African Repository, 45, 308–13.Google Scholar
Clammer, J. 1975. ‘Economic anthropology and the sociology of development’, in Oxaal, I., Barnett, A. and Booth, D. (eds.) Beyond the Sociology of Development. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 208–28.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. P. 1975. The Management of Myths. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
D'Ollone, , Cpt 1901. De la Côte d'lvoire au Soudain et à La Guinée. Paris: Librarie Hachette.Google Scholar
Dupré, G. and Rey, P.-P. 1978. ‘Reflections on the relevance of a theory of the history of exchange’, in Seddon, D. (ed.), 171–208.Google Scholar
Godelier, M. 1972. Rationality and Irrationality in Economics. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Hindess, B. and Hirst, P. Q. 1975. Pre-capitalist modes of production. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hindess, B. and Hirst, P. Q. 1977. Mode of Production and Social Formation. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, P. Q. 1979. ‘The necessity of theory’, Economy and Society, 8(4), 417–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, R. 1962. ‘The High God: A Comment on Fr O'Connell's Paper’, Man, 219, 67–9.Google Scholar
Horton, R. 1976. ‘Stateless societies in the history of West Africa’, in Ajayi, J. F. A. and Crowder, M. (eds.) History of West Africa, Vol. 1 (2nd Edn). London: Longman, 72–113.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. S. 1981. ‘Marxist anthropology and segmentary societies: A Review’, in Kahn, and Llobera, (eds.), 57–88.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. S. and Llobera, J. R. 1981. ‘Towards a new Marxism or a new anthropology?’, in Kahn, J. S. and Llobera, J. R. (eds.) The Anthropobgy of Pre-Capitalist Societies. London: Macmillan, 263–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krapf-Askari, E. 1972. ‘Women, spears and the scarce good’, in Singer, A. and Street, B. (eds.) Zande Themes. Oxford: Blackwells, 19–40.Google Scholar
Law, R. 1978. ‘In search of a Marxist perspective in pre-colonial tropical Africa’, Journal of African History, 19(3), 441–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meillassoux, C. 1972. ‘From reproduction to production’, Economy and Society, 1(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meillassoux, C. 1973. ‘The social organization of the peasantry: the economic basis of kinship’, J. Peasant Studies, 1, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meillassoux, C. 1978a. ‘“The economy” in agricultural self-sustaining societies: a preliminary analysis’, in Seddon, (ed.), 127–57.Google Scholar
Meillassoux, C. 1978b. ‘Kinship relations and relations of production’, in Seddon, (ed.), 289–330.Google Scholar
Rey, P.-P. 1975. ‘The lineage mode of production’, Critique of Anthropology, 3, 27–79.Google Scholar
Seddon, D. (ed.). 1978. Relations of Production. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Terray, E. 1972. Marxism and ‘Primitive’ Societies. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Terray, E. 1975. ‘Class and class consciousness in the Abron kingdom of Gyaman’, in Bloch, M. (ed.) Marxist Analysis and Social Anthropology. London: Malaby Press, 85–135.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1978. ‘The poverty of theory’, in The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays. London: Merlin Press, 193–406.Google Scholar
Von Gnielinski, S. (ed.) 1972. Liberia in Maps. London: London University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1973. ‘Base and superstructure in Marxist cultural theory’, New Left Review, 82, 3–16.Google Scholar