Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T14:08:27.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poverty and production in a rural microcosm: Hanover, Cape1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Sean Archer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the popular consciousness, South African poverty is a phenomenon of the homeland or urban township and ghetto, more rarely of rural areas in the core economy. Such a perspective is determined largely by the higher visibility of the poor in the former localities in the recent past, for reasons of geography and political sensitivity. This study aimed to redress the balance, starting from two broad premises: first, that the technical and organisational changes in production and the growth of surplus labour observable in Hanover on a microscale are representative of secular trends in commercialised agriculture in the Karoo region as a whole; and, second, that the causes of poverty generation in that region cannot be satisfactorily examined in isolation from the wider political and economic processes within which they are embedded.

Résumé

Pauvreté et production dans un microcosme rural: Hanover, Province du Cap

Le district rural de Hanover connaît des changements économiques et démographiques de nature structurelle qui poseront de sérieux obstacles à l'élaboration de toute politique nouvelle en Afrique du Sud visant à augmenter le bien-être matériel et à réduire la pauvreté. Des travaux de recherche sur le terrain ainsi que les résultats d'un recensement mettent en évidence une tendance allant vers une organisation de la production et une concentration des droits fonciers, caractéristiques d'une région vaste dont l'économie repose essentiellement sur l'agriculture et sur des subventions de l'état. La majorité de la population de Hanover ne dispose d'aucune terre. Les habitants n'ont qu'un faible niveau d'éducation et n'ont que rarement l'occasion d'apprendre par la pratique ou par une production informelle; et surtout, ils sont incapables de faire évoluer ces conditions.

Type
Analysing divided economies
Information
Africa , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , October 1990 , pp. 471 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acocks, J. P. H. 1979. ‘The flora that matched the fauna’, Bothalia 12 (4), 673–709.Google Scholar
Archer, S., and Meyer, E. 1984. ‘Hanover: a profile of poverty on the Eiselen line’. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Carnegie Conference Paper No. 34.Google Scholar
Bowman, M. J. 1985. ‘Education, population trends and technological change’, Economics of Education Review 4(1), 29–44.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1952. Agricultural Census 1949/50. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1963. Population Census 1960, vol. 1: geographical distribution of the population. RP 62/1963. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1967. Agricultural Census 1962/63. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1976. Population Census 1970: geographical distribution of the population. 02–05–10. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1981. Gross Geographic Product at Factor Incomes by Magisterial District 1975. 09–14–04. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1982a. South African Statistics 1982. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1982b. Report on Prices 1980. 11–01–15. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1982c. Agricultural Census 1978. 06–01–14. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1984. Bulletin of Statistics. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1985. Population Census 1980: geographical distribution of the population with a review for 1951–1980. 02–80–13. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1986a. Population Census 1985: level of education by development region, statistical region and district. 02–85–04. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1986b. Population Census 1985: social characteristics. 02–85–06. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
CSS (Central Statistical Services), 1986c. Population Census 1985: geographical distribution of the population with a review for 1960–1985. 02–85–01. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. 1982. The Control of Resources. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fraginales, M. M. 1976. The Sugar Mill: the socioeconomic complex of sugar in Cuba, 1760–1860. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. Gale. 1973. World Agriculture in Disarray. London: Fontana.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, W. 1983. ‘The staff of life: living standards in China, 1977–81’, China Quarterly 93 (March), 17–50.Google Scholar
Lancaster, N. 1985. ‘Environmental change in Africa: nature or man’, Africa Seminar Paper, Centre for African Studies, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. 1983. ‘Measuring labour slack’, in Weisbrod, B. and Hughes, H. (eds.), Human Resources, Employment and Development, vol. 3, pp. 97–112. London: Macmillan for the International Economic Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, S. 1968. The Genesis of Modem Management. Harmonds worth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Psacharopoulos, G. 1984. ‘The contribution of education to economic growth: international comparisons’, in Kendrick, J. W. (ed.), International Comparisons of Productivity and Causes of the Slowdown, pp. 335–60. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Psacharopoulos, G. 1985. ‘Returns to education: a further international update and implications’, Journal of Human Resources 20 (4), 583–604.Google Scholar
Rabie, M. A., and Theron, C. H. B. 1983. ‘Soil’, in Fuggle, R. F. and Roberts, M. A. (eds.), Environmental Concerns in South Africa, pp. 142–63. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
Roux, P., and Vorster, M. 1983. ‘Vegetation change in the Karoo’, Proceedings of the Grassland Society of South Africa 18 (1), 25–9.Google Scholar
RSA (Republic of South Africa), 1979. Finale verslag van die werks-komitee insake dieekonomiese posisie van die boer en landbou finansiering in die algemeen. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1986. ‘Food, economics and entitlements’, Lloyds Bank Review 160, 1–20.Google Scholar